Case Search

Please select a category.

UNITED AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Petitioner, vs. PROFESSIONAL MEDICAL GROUP, INC., a/a/o RAQUEL GUTIERREZ, Respondent.

34 Fla. L. Weekly D232e
1 So. 3d 365

Insurance — Attorney’s fees — Circuit court acting in appellate capacity departed from essential requirements of law in awarding appellate attorney’s fees and costs to insured where insured was not prevailing party

UNITED AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Petitioner, vs. PROFESSIONAL MEDICAL GROUP, INC., a/a/o RAQUEL GUTIERREZ, Respondent. 3rd District. Case No. 3D08-2867. L.T. Case Nos. 06-221, 06-427, 04-2495. Opinion filed January 28, 2009. A Writ of Certiorari to the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Margarita Esquiroz, Gisela Cardonne Ely, and Maxine Cohen Lando, Judges. Counsel: Michael J. Neimand, for petitioner. Jose R. Iglesia; Armando Brana, for respondent.CONFESSION OF ERROR

(Before COPE, RAMIREZ, and SALTER, JJ.)

(PER CURIAM.) Based on respondent Professional Medical Group, Inc., a/a/o Raquel Gutierrez’s confession of error, we grant petitioner United Automobile Insurance Company’s Petition for Writ of Certioriari. Respondent agrees with petitioner that the Eleventh Judicial Circuit Court, acting in its appellate capacity, departed from the essential requirements of the law when it awarded respondent appellate attorney’s fees and costs. The respondent was not the prevailing party in the trial court. Pursuant to Brass & Singer, P.A. v. United Automobile Insurance Company, 944 So. 2d 252 (Fla. 2006), an appellate court cannot award appellate attorney’s fees to an insured unless the insured prevails on appeal.

Therefore, we conclude that the appellate division of the circuit court departed from the essential requirements of law in this case in granting the fees and costs to respondent. We thus grant the petition and quash the order granting these conditional fees and costs to respondent.

Skip to content