36 Fla. L. Weekly D1091d
60 So. 3d 592
Insurance — Appraisal — Compliance with post-loss requirements
UNITED PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, vs. ALFRED TUFF, Appellee. 3rd District. Case No. 3D10-2598. L.T. Case No. 09-58882. Opinion filed May 18, 2011. An Appeal from a non-final order from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Ellen L. Leesfield, Judge. Counsel: Conroy, Simberg, Ganon, Krevans, Abel, Lurvey, Morrow & Schefer and Shannon P. McKenna (Hollywood), for appellant. Alvarez, Carbonell, Feltman, Jimenez & Gomez and Jorge L. Carbonell and Paul B. Feltman, for appellee.
(Before RAMIREZ, C.J., and WELLS and CORTIÑAS, JJ.)ON CONFESSION OF ERROR
(PER CURIAM.)Based on Appellee’s proper confession of error and our own independent review of the record, we reverse the trial court’s non-final order compelling appraisal and remand for an evidentiary hearing to determine whether post-loss requirements were sufficiently complied with under the policy. See Citizens Prop. Ins. Corp. v. Gutierrez, No. 3D10-2134, 2011 WL 710148 (Fla. 3d DCA Mar. 2, 2011); Citizens Prop. Ins. Corp. v. Mango Hill Condo. Ass’n 12, 54 So. 3d 578 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011); Citizens Prop. Ins. Corp. v. Maytin, 51 So. 3d 591 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010); Citizens Prop. Ins. Corp. v. Galeria Villas Condo. Ass’n, 48 So. 3d 188 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010).
Reversed and remanded.
