fbpx

Case Search

Please select a category.

MERCURY INSURANCE COMPANY OF FLORIDA, Petitioner, vs. RPM MEDICAL CENTER, INC. (A/A/O HERMER J. GAROFALO), Respondent.

37 Fla. L. Weekly D421a
89 So. 3d 261

Insurance — Appellate attorney’s fees — Award of appellate attorney’s fees to insured pursuant to section 627.428(1), Florida Statutes, should have been conditioned upon insured ultimately prevailing in underlying proceeding

MERCURY INSURANCE COMPANY OF FLORIDA, Petitioner, vs. RPM MEDICAL CENTER, INC. (A/A/O HERMER J. GAROFALO), Respondent. 3rd District. Case No. 3D11-2466. L.T. Case Nos. 09-562 & 09-1352. Opinion filed February 15, 2012. A Writ of Certiorari to the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Appellate Division, Jose L. Fernandez, Migna Sanchez-Llorens, and Monica Gordo, Judges. Counsel: Scott W. Dutton, Ivy R. Ginsberg, and Gregory J. Blackburn (Tampa), for petitioner. Marlene S. Reiss, for respondent.

[Original court decision published at 18 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 733c.]

(Before CORTIÑAS, ROTHENBERG, and LAGOA, JJ.)

(PER CURIAM.) Upon review of the petition and the response, this Court denies the petition for writ of certiorari in part and grants the petition in part. The petition is denied as to the appellate division’s decision reversing the summary judgment entered in the county court. However, we grant the petition and quash the award of appellate attorney’s fees to respondent. Respondent properly concedes that the award of appellate attorney’s fees, pursuant to section 627.428(1), Florida Statutes, should have been conditioned upon respondent ultimately prevailing in the underlying proceeding. See Guadagno v. United Auto. Ins. Co., 36 Fla. L. Weekly D2323 (Fla. 3d DCA Oct. 19, 2011); Ramirez v. United Auto. Ins. Co., 67 So. 3d 1174 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011); Comprehensive Health Ctr., LLC v. United Auto. Ins. Co., 36 Fla. L. Weekly D1553 (Fla. 3d DCA July 20, 2011); see also Tench v. Am. Reliance Ins. Co., 671 So. 2d 801 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996) (on clarification); Allstate Ins. Co. v. De La Fe, 647 So. 2d 965 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994). See generally Petty v. Fla. Ins. Guaranty Ass’n, 37 Fla. L. Weekly S34, S35 (Fla. Jan. 19, 2012) (“[Section 627.428(1) provides that an insured will be entitled to an attorney’s fee award when coverage is disputed and the insured prevails.”). Accordingly, the award of appellate attorney’s fees is quashed and the cause is remanded to the circuit court for entry of a conditional award of appellate attorney’s fees to respondent.

Petition granted in part and denied in part.

Skip to content