40 Fla. L. Weekly D432a
157 So. 3d 506

Insurance — Sinkhole claims — Florida Insurance Guaranty Association — Covered claims — Question certified: Does the 2011 amendment to the definition of “covered claim” in section 631.54(3), Florida Statutes (2011), apply to a sinkhole claim, where the claim was filed with the insurer prior to the date of the amendment, but after the insurer became insolvent, triggering FIGA’s obligation to pay the claim

FLORIDA INSURANCE GUARANTY ASSOCIATION, INC, Appellant, v. WILLIAM SIMMONS AND SYLVIA SIMMONS, Appellees. 5th District. Case No. 5D13-4095. Opinion filed February 13, 2015. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hernando County, Richard Tombrink, Jr., Judge. Counsel: Hinda Klein, and Diane H. Tutt, of Conroy, Simberg, Ganon, Krevans, Abel, Lurvey, Morrow, & Schefer, P.A., Hollywood, for Appellant. George A. Vaka, and Nancy A. Lauten, of Vaka Law Group, P.L., Tampa, and Kenneth C. Thomas, Jr., of Marshall Thomas Burnett, Land O’Lakes for Appellees.

(PER CURIAM.) After de novo review, we reverse the lower court’s order. Fla. Ins. Guar. Ass’n v. De La Fuente, 40 Fla. L. Weekly D123 (Fla. 2d DCA Jan. 7, 2015); Fla. Ins. Guar. Ass’n v. Bernard, 140 So. 3d 1023 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014), review denied, No. SC14-1416 (Fla. Dec. 5, 2014). We instruct the trial court to enter an order in favor of Appellant in accordance with the cited authorities. We certify the following question to the Florida Supreme Court as one of great public importance:

Does the 2011 amendment to the definition of “covered claim” in section 631.54(3), Florida Statutes (2011), apply to a sinkhole claim, where the claim was filed with the insurer prior to the date of the amendment, but after the insurer became insolvent, triggering FIGA’s obligation to pay the claim.

REVERSED AND REMANDED. (TORPY, C.J., PLEUS, R. J., Senior Judge and SWANSON, R., Associate Judge, concur.)