Case Search

Please select a category.

NEUROSCIENCE & SPINE ASSOCIATES, P.L., as assignee of Rafije Ljoki, Plaintiff, vs. ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant.

10 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 465a

Insurance — Personal injury protection — Small claims — Proposal for settlement — Because small claims actions are excluded from application of Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, court has discretion whether to apply rule 1.442 for purposes of filing proposal for settlement — Motion to apply rule 1.442 denied

NEUROSCIENCE & SPINE ASSOCIATES, P.L., as assignee of Rafije Ljoki, Plaintiff, vs. ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. County Court, 20th Judicial Circuit in and for Collier County. Case No. 02-3018-SP. March 7, 2003. Vincent Murphy, Judge. Counsel: Lorca Divale, Divale & Tolentino, P.A., Naples. Brian C. Vigness.

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO APPLY FLORIDA RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 1.442

This cause coming to be heard upon the foregoing Motion to Apply Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.442 and the court having considered the record, having heard argument of counsel, and otherwise being duly advised in the premise, it is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:

1. Plaintiff filed a Personal Injury Protection (PIP) suit in Small Claims Court for damages in the amount of $1,965.97.

2. Defendant, Allstate Insurance Company, filed a Motion to Apply Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.442 for purposes of filing a Proposal For Settlement.

3. Defendant argues that Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.442 is applicable to PIP actions pursuant to U.S. Security Insurance Co. v. Cahuasqui, 760 So. 2d 1101 (Fla. 3rd DCA 2000).

4. Plaintiff argues that this court is not bound by the ruling in Cahuasqui because application of additional rules of Civil Procedure is at this court’s discretion pursuant to Florida Small Claims Rule 7.020(c).

5. Plaintiff further argues that Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.442 is incompatible with the Florida Supreme Court’s ruling in Allstate Insurance Company v. Ivey, 25 Fla. L. Weekly S1103 (Fla. 2003) in conjunction with the Second District Court of Appeal’s ruling in Doyle-Vallery v. Arinabar, 28 Fla. L. Weekly D336 (Fla. 2nd DCA 2003).

6. This court finds that Florida Rules of Civil Procedure 1.010 and 1.040 clearly exclude Small Claims actions from the required application of the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure and therefore this court is not bound by the ruling in Cahuasqui. At this court’s discretion Defendant’s Motion is denied and the instant action will proceed without application of Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.442.

* * *

Skip to content