12 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 965a
Attorney’s fees — Insurance — Personal injury protection — Amount — Contingency risk multiplier — Where contingency fee retainer agreement between medical providers and attorney was pure contingency fee agreement, but relevant market did not require contingency fee multiplier to obtain competent counsel, multiplier is not applicable — Prejudgment interest, expert witness fee and costs awarded
CICERO ORTHO-MED CENTER, INC., and TRAUMATOLOGY REHAB. CENTER, INC., as assignees of Yarimette Gonzalez, Plaintiff, vs. UNITED AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. County Court, 11th Judicial Circuit in and for Miami-Dade County. Case No. 02-8120 SP 25 (2). July 8, 2005. Lawrence D. King, Judge. Counsel: Kevin W. Whitehead, Downs Brill Whitehead, Coral Gables. Nicole R. Malick.
ORDER AND FINAL JUDGMENT FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES AND COSTS
THIS CAUSE having come to be heard on June 30th, 2005, after due notice to all parties, on Plaintiff’s, CICERO ORTHO-MED CENTER, INC., and TRAUMATOLOGY REHAB. CENTER, INC., as assignees of Yarimette Gonzalez’, Motion to Determine Amount of Attorney’s Fees and Costs, after due notice to the parties, the Court having reviewed the record, heard argument of counsel, the evidence presented at the hearing, testimony from expert witnesses, and having been otherwise fully advised in the premises
It is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:
1. This Court finds that CICERO ORTHO-MED CENTER, INC., and TRAUMATOLOGY REHAB. CENTER, INC., as assignees of Yarimette Gonzalez, and their attorneys, Downs Brill Whitehead (formerly known as Downs & Associates, P.A.), are entitled to recover a reasonable attorney’s fees from Defendant, UNITED AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, pursuant to Florida Statutes §627.736 and §627.428.
2. This Court has considered all of the factors enumerated in Florida Patient’s Compensation Fund v. Rowe, 472 So. 2d 1145 (Fla. 1985) and Rule 4-1.5, Rules Regulating the Florida Bar. Specifically, this Court finds that counsel for Plaintiff, Kevin W. Whitehead, Esq., reasonably expended 129.50 hours in the prosecution of this breach of contract (PIP) lawsuit, and Zachary McWilliams, Esq., reasonably expended 1.5 hours in the prosecution of this breach of contract (PIP) lawsuit. This finding is based upon the time sheets filed by Kevin W. Whitehead, Esq. with this Court, the testimony from Kevin W. Whitehead, Esq., and expert witnesses at the fee hearing.
3. Pursuant to Florida Patient’s Compensation Fund v. Rowe, 472 So.2d 1145 (Fla. 1985) and the factors enumerated in Rule 4-1.5, Rules Regulating the Florida Bar, this Court finds that Kevin W. Whitehead, Esq. is entitled to be compensated at the rate of $325.00 per hour for his time, and Zachary McWilliams, Esq., is entitled to be compensated at the rate of $220.00 per hour for his time. This finding is based upon evidence presented concerning fees customarily charged in Miami-Dade County by lawyers of reasonably comparable skill, experience and reputation for the quality of legal services performed in this case, the time limitations imposed by the circumstances, the nature and length of the professional relationship between Plaintiff and counsel and the experience, and the reputation and ability of Kevin W. Whitehead, Esq. and Zachary McWilliams, Esq.
4. Pursuant to Florida Patient’s Compensation Fund v. Rowe, 472 So.2d 1145 (Fla. 1985), this Court finds that the lodestar, the number of hours reasonably expended 129.50 multiplied by the reasonable hourly rate of $325.00 for Kevin Whitehead, Esq. is $42,087.50 and the number of hours reasonably expended 1.5 multiplied by the reasonable hourly rate of $220.00 for Zachary McWilliams is $330.00 for a total amount of $42,417.00.
5. This Court finds that pursuant to Plaintiff’s Contingency Fee Retainer agreement between Plaintiffs and their counsel, Kevin W. Whitehead, Esq., was employed on a pure contingency basis and consequently, this Court must consider a contingency risk factor (multiplier) since it is awarding a statutorily-directed reasonable attorney fee (pursuant to Florida Statute §627.428).
6. This Court has considered all of the factors enumerated in Standard Guaranty Insurance Co. v. Quanstrom, 555 So.2d 828 (Fla. 1990). Specifically, this Court finds that this is a “category two case” (principally tort and contract cases). The Court finds that for this case, the relevant market did not require a contingency fee multiplier. This Court has also considered all of the factors in Rowe and Rule 4-1.5 of the Rules Regulating the Florida Bar.
7. This Court has considered all of the factors enumerated in State Farm Fire & Casualty v. Palma, 555 So.2d 836 (Fla. 1990) and 629 So.2d 830 (Fla. 1993). Specifically, the fee agreement between plaintiff and counsel in this case constituted a pure contingency fee arrangement; the amount of the fee was not to be determined by the amount of the recovery.
8. Consequently, pursuant to the foregoing cited authorities, this Court finds that a multiplier is not applicable in this case. Accordingly, this Court hereby does not apply a multiplier to the loadstar of fees.
9. This Court finds that Plaintiff’s counsel was entitled to collect a fee award from it on 3/1/05. Consequently, pursuant to Quality Engineered Installation, Inc. v. Higley South, Inc., 670 So.2d 929 (Fla. 1996), Plaintiff s counsel is entitled to collect 7% interest per annum on the fee award of $42,417.00 from 3/1/05 through today for interest in the amount of $1,024.88.
10. This Court has considered Florida Statute, §92.231 and Stokus v. Phillips, 651 So.2d 1244 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995). The Court finds that Plaintiff’s expert witness, Dan Kaufman, Esq., expected to be compensated for the services he rendered in this case. This Court finds that a reasonable amount of time expended by Plaintiff’s expert witness in this case is 4.5 hours and that a reasonable expert witness fee is $300.00 per hour. Consequently, Dan Kaufman, Esq. is entitled to be compensated for her expert witness services rendered in this matter in the amount of $1,350.00.
11. This Court finds that Plaintiff’s counsel is entitled to taxable costs in the amount of $844.30, all of which the Court determines to be taxable against Defendant.
12. For which let execution issue, the Plaintiff’s counsel is awarded a total amount of $45,636.18 against the Defendant, United Automobile Insurance Company, 3909 N.E. 163rd Street, North Miami Beach, FL 33160.
13. This Court finds that Downs Brill Whitehead is entitled to collect 7% interest per annum on the total award of $45,636.18 from the date of this Final Judgment through the date the total award is delivered to Kevin W. Whitehead, Esquire at Downs Brill Whitehead, 255 University Drive, Coral Gables, FL 33134 or current business address.
14. This Court reserves jurisdiction to enforce this Final Judgment, as well as any previous Judgements and/or Orders in this matter, and to do any and all other acts necessary in this cause.
* * *
