12 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 1172c
Insurance — Personal injury protection — Section 627.736 does not make provisions for plaintiff to demand escrow of PIP benefits pending resolution of dispute
TERLEP CHIROPRACTIC, P.A., a/a/o LAURA CASINO, Plaintiff(s), vs. PROGRESSIVE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. County Court, 5th Judicial Circuit in and for Hernando County. Case No. H-27-SP-2004-780. TERLEP CHIROPRACTIC, P.A., a/a/o MELISSA FERNANDEZ a/a/o SHEREEN MARGIEH, Plaintiff(s), vs. PROGRESSIVE AUTO PRO INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. Case Nos. H-27-SP-2004-1467 and H-27-SP-2004-1468. TERLEP CHIROPRACTIC, P.A., a/a/o GRACE PAHLAS, Plaintiff(s), vs. PROGRESSIVE EXPRESS INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. Case No. H-27-SP-2005-83. September 2, 2005. Donald E. Scaglione, Judge. Counsel: Amy Cohen, New Port Richey. Gale Young, Gale L. Young, P.A., Tampa.
AMENDED MOTION ORDER OF AUGUST 1, 2005
THIS MATTER having come before the Court on pending motions and the Court ruling on Defendant’s Motion to Strike Paragraph #15 for counsel to provide supplemental case law, and the Court having considered the case law submitted by Plaintiff and Defendant, as well as argument of counsel present during the hearing, and being otherwise advised in the premises, it is
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED the Defendant’s motion is GRANTED and paragraph #15 of Plaintiff’s Complaint is hereby stricken. F.S. §627.736 does not make provisions for the Plaintiff to demand an escrow of Personal Injury Protection (PIP) benefits pending the resolution of the dispute.
* * *
