14 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 305d

Insurance — Personal injury protection — Arbitration — Motion to dispense with arbitration is denied where it is not clear that facts as to fee-splitting defense are undisputed

FLORIDA MRI, INC. (a/a/o John Paz) vs. UNITED AUTOMOBILE INS. CO. County Court, 17th Judicial Circuit in and for Broward County. Case No. 06-4380 COCE 53. January 22, 2007. Robert W. Lee, Judge. Counsel: Steven Lander, Fort Lauderdale, for Plaintiff. Ben Soo-Hoo, Coral Gables, for Defendant.

ORDER

THIS CAUSE having come on for consideration of Plaintiff’s Motion to Dispense with Arbitration and the Court having been sufficiently advised in the Premises, it is hereupon,

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that said Motion be, and the same is hereby DENIED without prejudice. At this point, the record is not clear that the facts are undisputed as to the fee-splitting defense, with the only issue being one of law. If the parties are able to stipulate to the facts, the Court will reconsider its ruling. Rule 1.700(b)(2).