fbpx

Case Search

Please select a category.

AQUINO CHIROPRACTIC CENTER, P.A. (Franklin Lara), Plaintiff, vs. UNITED AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant.

20 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 623b

Online Reference: FLWSUPP 2006LARAInsurance — Personal injury protection — Coverage — Medical expenses — Reasonableness of charges

AQUINO CHIROPRACTIC CENTER, P.A. (Franklin Lara), Plaintiff, vs. UNITED AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. County Court, 17th Judicial Circuit in and for Broward County. Case No. 11-14445 COCE (52). March 4, 2013. Honorable Stacy Ross, Judge. Counsel: Abdul-Sumi Dalal, Steven Lander and Associates, P.L., Fort Lauderdale, for Plaintiff. Rashad El-Amin, Office of General Counsel, United Automobile Insurance Company, Miami, for Defendant.

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTIONFOR FINAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT

THIS CAUSE came to be heard before the Court on hearing on January 25, 2013 on Plaintiff’s Motion for Final Summary judgment and, having reviewed the motions and having heard argument; reviewed the relevant legal authorities; and had been sufficiently advised in the premises, the Court finds as follows:

As loss, coverage, relatedness, and necessity has been stipulated to by the Defendant, the only issue before this Court is whether the Plaintiff’s bills are reasonable. After reviewing Defendant’s insurance policy, F.S. 627.736(5), relevant legal authorities including but not limited to: Kingsway Amigo v. Ocean Health 63 So.3d 63 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011) [36 Fla. L. Weekly D1062a]; oral arguments; additional case law submitted by each party; evidence presented including affidavits and the deposition transcript filed by the Defendant, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

1. Plaintiff’s Motion is GRANTED as to loss, coverage, reasonableness, relatedness and medical necessity.

2. Final judgment for Plaintiff is proper.

* * *

Skip to content