fbpx

Case Search

Please select a category.

QUANTUM IMAGING HOLDINGS, LLC (a/a/o Luetessie Freeman), Plaintiff, vs. EQUITY INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant.

20 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 709a

Online Reference: FLWSUPP 2007FREEInsurance — Arbitration — Where parties did not request trial de novo within deadline for such request, trial court must enter judgment in accordance with arbitrator’s decision

QUANTUM IMAGING HOLDINGS, LLC (a/a/o Luetessie Freeman), Plaintiff, vs. EQUITY INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant.County Court, 17th Judicial Circuit in and for Broward County. Case No. 11-10131 COCE (53). May 7, 2013. Robert W. Lee, Judge. Counsel: Emilio R. Stillo, Davie, for Plaintiff. Nadine Gabay-Babyack, Miami, for Defendant.

FINAL JUDGMENT ON ARBITRATOR’S DECISIONIN FAVOR OF PLAINTIFF

THIS CAUSE came before the Court for consideration of the notice of filing Arbitration Award filed by the Arbitrator Anthony J. Titone, and the Court’s having reviewed the docket, the entire Court file, and the relevant legal authorities; and having been sufficiently advised in the premises, the Court finds as follows:

This case was submitted to mandatory arbitration. The arbitrator served his decision by U.S. mail on March 19, 2013. Under Rule 1.820(h), Fla. R. Civ. P., a motion for trial de novo must be “made” within 20 days of the “service” of the arbitrator’s decision. Under Florida law, “a party has the right to move for a trial within twenty days after service of the arbitrator’s decision. If no motion for trial is timely served, then the trial court must enforce the decision of the arbitrator and has no discretion to do otherwise” (emphasis added). Bacon Family Partners, L.P. v. Apollo Condominium Ass’n, 852 So.2d 882, 888 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003) [28 Fla. L. Weekly D1795a]. See also Johnson v. Levine, 736 So.2d 1235, 1238 n.3 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999) [24 Fla. L. Weekly D1456a]; Klein v. J.L. Howard, Inc., 600 So.2d 511, 512 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992). The Court lacks discretion to deny entry of a judgment in accordance with the arbitrator’s decision when the parties fail to timely request a trial de novo or otherwise fail to dispose of the case of record within the de novo deadline.

The parties’ request for trial de novo was required to be filed with the Clerk no later than April 15, 2013. (A five-day mailing period is added because the arbitrator served his decision only by U.S. mail.) See Federated Financial Corp. of America v. Cohen, 14 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 981b (Broward Cty. Ct. 2007); Rule 1.090(e). The Clerk has confirmed that it is current with docketing of all matters through the noted deadline. Neither party filed a timely request. As a result, the Court is required to enter judgment in accordance with the Arbitrator’s decision. See Gossett & Gossett, P.A. v. Fleming, 10 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 839b (Broward Cty. Ct. 2003). Accordingly, the Court has this day unsealed the Arbitrator’s decision.

As a result, it is hereby ADJUDGED THAT:

The Plaintiff shall recover from the Defendant, EQUITY INSURANCE COMPANY, the sum of $600.00, which sum shall hereafter bear interest at the rate of 4.75% per annum. The Plaintiff is also entitled to an award of attorney’s fees and costs, which the Court reserves jurisdiction to determine.

* * *

Skip to content