21 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 350a
Online Reference: FLWSUPP 2104MUNOInsurance — Coverage — Exhaustion of policy limits
Y H IMAGING, INC., a/a/o LISANDRA MUNOZ, Plaintiff(s), vs. UNITED AUTO INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant(s). County Court, 11th Judicial Circuit in and for Miami-Dade County, Civil Division. Case No. 12-21663 SP 05 (04). September 19, 2013. Lourdes Simon, Judge. Counsel: Wajih A. Shirazi, Arias Law Group, P.A., Hollywood, for Plaintiff. Camille Riviere, Office of the General Counsel, UAIC, Trial Division, Miami, for Defendant.
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTIONFOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AS TO THE ISSUEOF EXHAUSTION OF BENEFITS
THIS CAUSE came before this Honorable Court on Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment as to the Issue of Exhaustion of Benefits, and the Court being otherwise fully advised in the premises, it is:
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:
Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment as to the Issue of Exhaustion of Benefits is hereby GRANTED. Court relies on the following authority:
Geico General Ins. Co. v. Virtual Imaging Services, Inc., 38 Fla. L. Weekly S517a (Fla. July 3, 2013); Kingsway Amigo Ins. Co. v. Ocean Health, Inc. a/a/o Belizaire Gomez, 63 So.3d 63 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011) [36 Fla. L. Weekly D1062a]; Geico General Ins. Co. v. Virtual Imaging Services, Inc., 79 So.3d 55 Fla. 3rd DCA 2011) [36 Fla. L. Weekly D2597a]; Coral Imaging Services a/a/o Virgilio Reyes v. Geico Indemnity Ins. Co., 955 So.2d 11 (Fla. 3rd DCA 2006) [31 Fla. L. Weekly D2478a]; and Geico Indemnity Co. v. Gables Insurance Recovery, Inc. a/a/o Rita M. Lauzan, Case No. 12-069 AP (Opinion filed on June 25th, 2013) [20 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 862a].
* * *
