22 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 1078a
Online Reference: FLWSUPP 2209SUNAttorney’s fees — Discovery
EMERGENCY PHYSICIANS OF CENTRAL FLORIDA, LLP, as assignee of Hisayo Sun, Plaintiff, v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. County Court, 9th Judicial Circuit in and for Orange County. Case No. 2013-SC-10408-O. May 19, 2015. Jeanette D. Bigney, Judge. Counsel: David B. Alexander, Bradford Cederbert, P.A., Orlando, for Plaintiff. John Morrow, Orlando, for Defendant.
ORDER ON MAY 12, 2015 HEARING
THIS MATTER having come before this Honorable Court on Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Better Responses to Request to Produce Regarding Attorney’s Fees and Costs and Plaintiff’s Motion to Deem Any Potential Objections to Plaintiff’s Time Sheets and Costs Waived and this Honorable Court having heard arguments of counsel on May 12, 2015 and being otherwise fully advised in the premises, it is hereby,
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that:
1. Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Better Responses to Request to Produce Regarding Attorney’s Fees and Costs is GRANTED as to numbers one (1), two (2), three (3), and four (4).
2. As to request number one (1), Defendant shall produce to Plaintiff any and all documents Defendant intends to rely on at the hearing on Plaintiff’s Motion For Attorneys’ Fees and Costs in this case no later than May 19, 2015.
3. As to request number two (2), Defendant shall produce to Plaintiff any and all documents Defendant intends to rely on at the hearing on Plaintiff’s Motion For Attorneys’ Fees and Costs in this case to support any allegation by Defendant that Plaintiff’s attorney is not entitled to a contingency risk multiplier in this matter no later than May 19, 2015.
4. As to request number three (3), Defendant shall produce to Plaintiff the resume, CV or any other biographical documentation on the Attorney fees expert Defendant expects will testify on behalf of the Defendant in this case no later than May 19, 2015.
5. As to request number four (4), Defendant shall produce to Plaintiff any and all attorney, paralegal assistant and/or secretary time sheets related to this case, with all attorney-client and work-product privileged notations redacted no later than May 19, 2015. Defendant shall not redact any non-privileged information.
6. The Court hereby takes no action at this time on request numbers five (5), six (6), and seven (7) as Plaintiff withdrew same at the May 12, 2015 hearing.
7. The Court hereby takes no action at this time on Plaintiff’s Motion to Deem Any Potential Objections to Plaintiff’s Time Sheets and Costs Waived. The Court will address same at the hearing on Plaintiff’s Motion For Attorneys’ Fees and Costs.
* * *
