23 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 615a
Online Reference: FLWSUPP 2306RODRInsurance — Discovery — Geozip report and decision point report
HEALTH DIAGNOSTICS OF MIAMI, LLC, d/b/a STAND-UP MRI OF MIAMI, a/a/o Celina Rodriguez, Plaintiff, vs. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. County Court, 17th Judicial Circuit in and for Broward County. Case No. CONO13-009951(70). November 5, 2015. John D. Fry, Judge. Counsel: Andrew J. Weinstein, Weinstein Law Firm, Coral Springs, for Plaintiff. Kathryn M. Winkler, Kirwan, Spellacy & Danner, Fort Lauderdale, for Defendant.
ORDER REQUIRING STATE FARM TOPRODUCE A “GEOZIP” REPORT, DECISIONPOINT REPORT, OR ITS EQUIVALENT ON ORBEFORE NOVEMBER 10, 2015 AT 5:00 P.M.
THIS CAUSE having come to be considered and the Court having heard argument from counsel, having reviewed the Court file, and being otherwise advised in the Premises, it is hereupon ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:
Defendant is hereby put on notice that it has until 5:00 p.m. on November 10, 2015 to review all pending files in this division for violated Order(s) compelling production of the “GeoZip” report, which includes, but is not limited to, instances where the court has ordered the production of “GeoZip”.
By the deadline set forth above, Defendant is hereby ordered to produce a copy of the “geozip” report, decision point report, or its equivalent including every claim from healthcare providers (including hospitals) in the County where the services were rendered, for the same CPT code at issue in this case, for the time period from 60 days before and 60 days after the date(s) of service at issue in this lawsuit. Additionally, the report must include the following information:
1. The claim number;
2. The date of service;
3. The CPT code;
4. The name of the healthcare provider;
5. The address of the healthcare provider;
6. The amount of each healthcare providers’ charge for each CPT code;
7. The amount of the recommended reimbursement for each CPT code;
If Defendant does not produce these report(s) by 5:00 p.m., November 10, 2015, the Court may strike Defendant’s pleadings as outlined in Rule 1.380(b)(2) of the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure; Kozel v. Ostendorf, 629 So. 2d 817 (Fla. 1994), Mercer v. Raine, 443 So. 2d 944 (Fla. 1983), and Ham v. Dunmire, 891 So. 2d 492 (Fla. 2004) [30 Fla. L. Weekly S6a].
