28 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 465b
Online Reference: FLWSUPP 2806GHENInsurance — Personal injury protection — Summary judgment — Error to reject affidavit of expert on reasonableness of charges
UNITED AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, v. HALLANDALE OPEN MRI, LLC, a/a/o Carita Ghent, Appellee. Circuit Court, 11th Judicial Circuit (Appellate) in and for Miami-Dade County. Case No. 2017-316-AP-01. L.T. No. 13-15916-SP-23. August 11, 2020. On Appeal from County Court in and for Miami-Dade County, Florida, Hon. Alexander Bokor, Judge. Counsel: Michael J. Neimand, House Counsel for United Automobile Insurance Company, for Appellant. Chad A. Barr and Heather M. Kolinsky Law Office of Chad A. Barr, P.A., for Appellee.
(Before TRAWICK, WALSH, and BEOVIDES, JJ.)
OPINION
(PER CURIAM.) United Auto Insurance Company (“UAIC”) appeals the trial court’s order granting final summary judgment on behalf of Hallandale Open MRI, LLC. (“Provider”). Here, the trial court rejected the conflicting affidavit offered by UAIC of Denorah Lang, and summary judgment was granted on the Provider’s Motion for Summary Judgment regarding Reasonableness1.
As this panel and the majority of prior panels from this Court have found, it was an abuse of discretion to exclude UAIC’s conflicting affidavit on whether the medical bills at issue were reasonable in price. Taking UAIC’s excluded affidavit into account, it was error to grant summary judgment. See United Auto. Ins. Co. v. Miami-Dade MRI a/a/o Bermudez, 2018-164 (Fla. 11th Cir. Ct. June 3, 2020) [28 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 299a]; State Farm Mutual Ins. Co. v. Gables Insurance Recovery a/a/o Yuderis Rego, 27 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 860a (Fla. 11th Cir. Ct. Nov. 20, 2019); United Automobile Insurance Co. v. Open MRI of Miami Dade, Ltd. a/a/o Rosa Castillo, Case No. 2017-326-AP-01 (Fla. 11th Cir. Ct. Nov. 6, 2019) [27 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 791b]; United Automobile Insurance Co., Appellant, v. Miami Dade County MRI, Corp. a/a/o Marta Figueredo, 27 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 506b (Fla. 11th Cir. App. July 30, 2019); United Automobile Insurance Co., Appellant, v. Miami Dade County MRI, Corp. a/a/o Javier Rodriguez, 27 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 225c (Fla. 11th Cir. Ct. July 25, 2019); United Automobile Insurance Co., Appellant, v. Miami Dade County MRI, Corp. a/a/o Rene Dechard, 27 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 226a (Fla. 11th Cir. Ct., August 12, 2019); United Automobile Insurance Co., Appellant, v. Millennium Radiology, LLC a/a/o Javier Rodriguez, 25 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 911b (Fla. 11th Cir. Ct. July 19, 2019).
Accordingly, the summary judgment and final judgment entered below are hereby REVERSED, and this cause is REMANDED to the trial court.
Appellee’s Motion for Attorney’s Fees is DENIED. Appellant’s Motion for Attorney’s Fees is conditionally GRANTED (conditioned upon Appellant ultimately prevailing and the enforceability of the proposal for settlement) and REMANDED to the trial court to fix amount.
__________________
1Appellant, UAIC, stipulated to the issues of Relatedness and Medical Necessity.
