fbpx

Case Search

Please select a category.

STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff, vs. MANUEL S. ROSE, MD, Defendant.

8 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 735b

Insurance — Discovery — Order compelling discovery regarding MRI interpretation services

STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff, vs. MANUEL S. ROSE, MD, Defendant. County Court, 6th Judicial Circuit in and for Pinellas County, Civil Division. Case No. 00-006109-CO-40. February 26, 2001. Henry J. Andringa, Judge. Counsel: David B. Kampf, Ramey, Ramey and Kampf, Tampa.

ORDER ON PLAINTIFF’S PETITON/COMPLAINTTO COMPEL DISCOVERY

THIS CAUSE came on for hearing on February 8, 2001, on Plaintiff’s Petition/Complaint to Compel Discovery and the Court being otherwise fully advised in the premises, it is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:

1. That State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company’s Petition/Complaint to Compel Discovery is hereby GRANTED. Manuel S. Rose, M.D., shall provide all documents requested in the Complaint including, but not limited to, all written contracts and evidence of the written contracts between Manuel S. Rose (or any other persons or entities rendering the interpretation services at issue) with TD Professional Services regarding MRI interpretation services governing the services related to the patient, Robert Russo.

2. Manuel S. Rose, M.D., shall have ten (10) days from the date of this Order in which to provide the documentation to State Farm.

3. That this Court awards costs to State Farm in the amount of $151.50 for which sum let execution issue.

4. This Court reserves jurisdiction to determine entitlement and reasonableness of attorney’s fees and costs to State Farm.

* * *

Skip to content