fbpx

Volume 10

Case Search

UNITED AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE CO., Appellant, v. EDY MARIO ARRIBA, Appellee.

10 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 972a

NOT FINAL VERSION OF OPINION
Subsequent Changes at 11 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 404b

Insurance — Personal injury protection — Summary judgment — Factual issue — Error to grant summary judgment in favor of plaintiff on issue of liability where accident report which fails to indicate that plaintiff was passenger in vehicle at time of accident created genuine issue of material fact

Read More »

ATWOOD NEUROSPINAL CLINIC, P.A. (a/a/o Irma Paul), Plaintiff, vs. PROGRESSIVE EXPRESS INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant.

10 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 1034a

Insurance — Personal injury protection — Claim forms — Where medical provider originally filed suit under name of one of his six corporations other than the corporation to which assignment of benefits was directed and filed HCFAs indicating treatment was completed by the plaintiff corporation rather than assignee corporation and containing other information that was false or misleading, HCFAs do not establish compliance with section 627.736, and plaintiff has failed to lawfully render treatment and provide insurer of notice of loss and amount thereof — Insurer’s motion for summary judgment granted

Read More »

BRADENTON SPINE AND JOINT CENTER, INC., as assignee of RANDALL MARISBERGER, Plaintiff, v. PROGRESSIVE EXPRESS INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant.

10 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 544b

Insurance — Personal injury protection — Dismissal — Assignment — Attachment of assignment of benefits to complaint of medical provider claiming PIP benefits pursuant to written assignment is not required by rule 1.130 — Provider’s allegation of standing by way of assignment must be taken as true for purposes of motion to dismiss — Motion to dismiss denied

Read More »

TED and ANNETTE NIZIOL et al., Plaintiff, vs. PROGRESSIVE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant.

10 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 914a

Insurance — Personal injury protection — Coverage — Where there is no evidence that gunshot wound inflicted on driver while driving vehicle was inflicted in any other manner than by accident and no suggestion that gunshot was caused by operation or maintenance of vehicle, there is not a sufficient nexus to indicate death was result of ownership, maintenance or use of vehicle — Summary judgment granted in favor of insurer

Read More »
Skip to content