10 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 554c
Insurance — Personal injury protection — Complaint — Defects — Action by insurer against MRI provider and its owner — There are no allegations of ultimate facts supporting legal conclusion that owner is alter ego of provider — Although complaint alleges that owner and provider did things to mislead insurer, a debtor, corporate veil is pierced where owner uses corporation to mislead creditors or creates general tort risk to public — Allegation that owner conspired with herself to mislead plaintiff insurer into believing that MRI provider rendered service is immaterial in that services billed for were actually performed under circumstances that were compensable to insurer’s insureds as indemnified persons, and mere fact that insureds permitted payment to provider rather than others involved in work establishes no material harm to insurer — Unjust enrichment — Insured has failed to allege circumstances establishing that it would be inequitable for defendants to retain benefits where there are no allegations that MRIs were overpriced, not medically necessary, not related, or not done, and insurer does not assert that insureds were not indemnified for MRIs, that insureds did not want payment made to defendants, or that insurer has obligation to any insured or third party for payment of same money paid to defendants — Declaratory relief — There is no bona fide, actual, present practical need for declaration where insurer knows allegations that defendants continue to engage in practices insurer deems unlawful are untrue or cannot make those allegations in good faith because owner testified in deposition that neither she nor MRI provider continue to present MRI claims to PIP insurers and have not done so in years — Fraud — Insurer has failed to establish key element that it has sustained damage — Case style — There are no allegations of ultimate fact supporting action “for the use and benefits of its insureds” — Further, because insurer seeks relief that could create unsatisfied obligation owed by insureds to MRI provider, insureds are indispensable parties