ADVANCED IMAGING GROUP, INC., (as assignee of Frank Midulla), Plaintiff, vs. PROGRESSIVE AUTO PRO INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant.
11 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 569d
Insurance — Motion to strike plaintiff’s demand for escrow of benefits granted
11 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 569d
Insurance — Motion to strike plaintiff’s demand for escrow of benefits granted
11 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 248b
Insurance — Personal injury protection — Demand for escrow of insurance benefits is stricken
11 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 248a
Insurance — Personal injury protection — Demand for escrow of disputed benefits in eventuality that benefits are exhausted is stricken
11 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 1084a
Insurance — Personal injury protection — Coverage — Exhaustion of policy limits — Summary judgment entered in favor of insurer
11 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 653b
NOT FINAL VERSION OF OPINION
Subsequent Changes at 11 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 839a
Insurance — Personal injury protection — Coverage — Exhaustion of policy limits — Insurer’s motion for summary judgment is granted where policy limits were exhausted after provider/assignee filed suit — Conflict certified
11 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 650c
Insurance — Personal injury protection — Coverage — Exhaustion of policy limits — Where policy limits were exhausted prior to insurer’s receipt of provider/assignee’s suit, provider did not provide notice prior to exhaustion of policy limits that it disputed or protested reductions or denials, and final benefits payment made to provider exceeded benefits potentially in controversy such that insurer’s reductions and denials resulted in no net effect upon total PIP benefits paid to provider under disputed claim, insurer’s motion for summary judgment is granted
11 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 648a
Insurance — Personal injury protection — Coverage — Exhaustion of policy limits — Summary judgment is granted in favor of insurer where policy limits were exhausted after filing of original complaint but prior to filing of amended complaint naming proper plaintiff/provider
11 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 1012a
Insurance — Personal injury protection — Coverage — Summary judgment — Factual issues — Summary judgment is not appropriate on issue of whether settlement of outstanding medical bills between insured and provider/assignee precludes provider from seeking recovery of remaining balance of PIP benefits where intent of parties to settlement is issue of material fact not to be determined on motion for summary judgment — Conditions precedent — Examination under oath — Insurer is not absolved of liability to pay PIP benefits by insured’s failure to attend EUO scheduled to occur after expiration of insurer’s thirty-day deadline to authenticate claim — Motions for summary judgment denied
11 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 1008b
Insurance — Personal injury protection — Coverage — Affirmative defenses — Exhaustion of policy limits — Estoppel — Insurer that never raised exhaustion of policy limits in answer and affirmative defenses is estopped from raising issue in motion for summary judgment — Had insurer raised exhaustion defense, court would have denied motion for summary judgment because benefits were available at time reduced payment was made
11 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 588a
Insurance — Personal injury protection — Service of demand letter on insurer is condition precedent to amending statement of claim to include bill that insurer did not reduce or deny, but for which insurer issued payment to wrong medical provider
Boca Raton Office
4800 N. Federal Hwy
Suite D204,
Boca Raton, FL 33431
*Direct all Mail to this office
Miami Office
1835 NW 112th Ave, Suite 164, Miami, FL 33172
Ft. Myers
3364 Cleveland Ave, Fort Myers, Fl 33901
Orlando Office
1925 E Michigan St, Suite 201, Orlando, FL 32806