Volume 11

Case Search

ROBERT C. NUCCI, M.D. on behalf of Esperanza Moore, Plaintiff, v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, a foreign corporation, Defendant.

11 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 446b

Attorney’s fees — Insurance — Personal injury protection — Justiciable issues — Where insurer provided notice that provider/assignee stated wrong date of accident in complaint, insurer properly paid all bills with regard to correct date of accident, and provider failed to satisfy condition precedent of pre-suit demand letter, provider/assignee knew or should have known that claim as stated in complaint was not supported by material facts necessary to establish claim nor was it supported by application of law to those facts — Insurer is awarded attorney’s fees paid in equal amounts by provider and provider’s counsel unless counsel is able to show she acted in good faith based on representations of client as to existence of material facts

Read More »

UNITED AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, vs. MIGUEL HERNANDEZ, Appellee.

11 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 406a

Insurance — Fraud on court — Sanctions — Denial — No abuse of discretion to deny insurer’s motion to strike opposing counsel’s affidavit regarding attorney’s fees and dismiss claim due to fraud on court where opposing counsel claimed 25 hours for preparation of confession of judgment that was copy of pleading first filed by another attorney in different case, but counsel explained that he worked in conjunction with other attorney to prepare pleading and 25 hours was aggregate amount for all files in which issue arose and was pro-rated among the cases, and counsel withdrew the claim for 25 hours in its entirety

Read More »

PERRY MOORE, Plaintiff, vs. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant.

11 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 247b

Insurance — Personal injury protection — Attorney’s fees — Where attorney’s fees contract between insured and attorney limits fee award to percentage of amount awarded or stipulated to or percentage of remaining benefits under policy, motion for summary judgment awarding either of those two sums is granted, and jurisdiction to determine which of two sums is to be awarded is reserved pending additional argument

Read More »

YATES CHIROPRACTIC ASSOCIATES, as Assignee of Keri-Marie Martin, Plaintiff, v. PROGRESSIVE CONSUMERS INSURANCE COMPANY, a corporation authorized and doing business in the State of Florida, Defendant.

11 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 69c

Insurance — Attorney’s fees — Discovery — Depositions — Motions for protective order regarding depositions of insurer’s counsel and litigation adjuster are denied where deponents have or may have information beneficial to court in determining reasonable amount of attorney’s fees and costs and necessity of multiplier, to be used at attorney’s fees hearing — Motions for sanctions and to strike notices of depositions are denied

Read More »
Skip to content