JOHN NICHOLAS, Appellant/Cross-Appellee, v. PROGRESSIVE EXPRESS INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee/Cross-Appellant.
13 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 1033a
Insurance — Personal injury protection — Dispute between insured and insurer — Error to dismiss insured’s complaint as insufficiently pled where it is undisputed that valid contract of insurance existed, insured alleged in complaint that insurer that issued check payable only to medical provider after receipt of revocation of assignment of benefits failed to pay correct amount of money to correct claimant, in violation of contract and PIP statute, and insured alleged that he suffered damages as result of insurer’s breach — No merit to argument that revocation which revokes assignment of benefits but does not apply to any prior authorization for direct payment is confusing — There is clear distinction between assignment of benefits and direct payment authorization, and no such authorization appears on record — Error to dismiss complaint for failure to state cause of action while at same time granting partial relief under complaint by ordering insurer to reissue check in insured’s name — Attorney’s fees — Appellate — Insured is entitled to attorney’s fees for work done on initial and reply brief, but not for work done on unsuccessful cross-appeal seeking striking of order to re-issue check