fbpx

Volume 14

Case Search

OSCAR LITTLE and INEZ LITTLE, husband and wife, Plaintiffs, vs. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, a foreign corporation authorized to do business in the State of Florida, Defendant.

14 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 862a

Insurance — Uninsured motorist — Joinder of uninsured at-fault driver as co-defendant in insured’s breach of contract action against UM insurer is not required despite contract provision requiring insured to sue both insurer and at-fault driver — If insurer desires to join at-fault driver, it may file third-party action for subrogation

Read More »

JOHN GALLAGHER, Plaintiff, vs. STATE FARM FLORIDA INSURANCE COMPANY, a domestic corporation, Defendant.

14 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 553a

Insurance — Settlement agreement — Enforcement — Motion to enforce settlement agreement is granted, notwithstanding plaintiff’s attempt to call off settlement after defendant tendered payments in the agreed amounts and provided general release for plaintiff’s execution — Correspondence from plaintiff’s prior attorney consummated the settlement agreement previously reached, regardless of whether a release was to be executed, and lawsuit was to be dismissed with prejudice upon payment of the agreed amounts

Read More »

SCOTT DRUMMOND & DAVID AUSLANDER, Plaintiffs, v. AMICA MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant.

14 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 178a

Insurance — Personal injury protection — Summary judgment — Affirmative defenses — Insurer’s statement in prior motions that its only affirmative defense was insured’s alleged failure to attend examination under oath constituted tacit admission that failure to attend EUO was insurer’s only defense — Insurer may not assert additional affirmative defenses in attempt to defeat summary judgment

Read More »

STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff, vs. CITY OF VERO BEACH, Defendant.

14 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 887a

Insurance — Personal injury protection — Reimbursement of benefits — Operation of commercial vehicle — Where insured, who was injured while operating city vehicle, suffered no actual loss even after having reimbursed city half of recovery received from third-party tortfeasor in settlement of workers’ compensation lien, PIP carrier could have denied insured’s PIP claim and has no right to reimbursement of unreasonable and unnecessary payment of PIP benefits from city

Read More »
Skip to content