Volume 14

Case Search

PROGRESSIVE AUTO PRO INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, v. DOCTOR’S PAIN MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATES, as assignee of DALON FINLEY, Appellee.

14 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 1010a

Insurance — Personal injury protection — Coverage — Medical expenses — Reasonable charges — Evidence — No error in admitting explanation of benefits forms from insurer and other entities that paid medical provider’s charges in full — No abuse of discretion in finding that Medicare fee schedule was irrelevant where provider does not accept Medicare patients — No abuse of discretion in finding workers’ compensation fee schedule irrelevant where, although provider accepts workers’ compensation patients, fee schedule is not only way provider receives payment for their treatment — No abuse of discretion in finding that testimony of physician who used to work for provider and who treated insured regarding his understanding of what the test he ordered would accomplish was not relevant to issue of reasonableness of charge for test — No abuse of discretion in sustaining relevancy objection to testimony of physical therapist who does not practice in same community as provider

Read More »

UNITED AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, v. MIAMI MEDICAL GROUP, INC. a/a/o CESAR CANEPA, Appellee.

14 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 1018a

Insurance — Personal injury protection — Coverage — Denial — Independent medical evaluation — Error to find that IME report that discusses lack of need for future medical treatment, therapy, and diagnostic testing did not terminate coverage for future medical evaluations — Court declines to distinguish, as matter of law, between medical evaluation and medical treatment, therapy, and diagnostic testing

Read More »

UNITED AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE CO., Appellant, vs. PARTNERS IN HEALTH CHIROPRACTIC CENTER, a/a/o CECELIE YANIQUE GERLIN, Appellee.

14 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 939a

NOT FINAL VERSION OF OPINION
Subsequent Changes at 15 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 123a

Insurance — Personal injury protection — Coverage — Medical expenses — Failure to obtain reasonable proof within 30 days — Insurer is not barred from contesting reasonableness, relatedness or necessity of treatment merely because peer review was obtained after benefits were denied and overdue — Remand to consider legal sufficiency of peer review affidavit

Read More »

UNITED AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, vs. PROFESSIONAL MEDICAL GROUP, INC., a/a/o VIVIAN FIGUEREDO, Appellee.

14 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 539a

Insurance — Personal injury protection — Coverage — Denial — Unreasonable, unrelated or unnecessary treatment — Failure to obtain reasonable proof within 30 days — Insurer’s failure to obtain medical or peer review report within 30 days did not preclude insurer from contesting reasonableness, relatedness or necessity of treatment — Error to grant summary judgment for medical provider because peer review report was submitted more than 30 days after claim was filed

Read More »

UNITED AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, vs. JUANA ANDRADE, as parent and guardian of EVELYN ANDRADE, a minor, Appellee.

14 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 132a

Insurance — Personal injury protection — Coverage — Medical expenses — Reasonable, related and necessary expenses — Summary judgment — Opposing affidavit — Validity — No error in entering summary judgment in favor of medical provider where affidavit and peer review report filed in opposition to motion did not comport with statutory requirements that they be based upon examination of patient or factually supported by examination and treatment records and prepared by physician in active practice

Read More »

DAMADIAN MRI IN POMPANO BEACH, P.A., d/b/a STAND UP MRI OF FORT LAUDERDALE, (Roberto Paredes, Patient), Plaintiff, vs. UNITED AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant.

14 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 782b

Insurance — Personal injury protection — Summary judgment — Opposing affidavit — Summary judgment granted in favor of medical provider on issue of reasonableness, relatedness and necessity of MRI where provider’s motion establishes prima facie entitlement to relief, and insurer’s affidavit was untimely served — Independent medical examination and peer review reports, if admissible, do not create genuine issue of material fact where IME was performed on day insured received MRI and opines only as to reasonableness, relatedness or necessity of further treatment — Explanation of benefits — Insurer breached policy by not furnishing provider with EOB County

Read More »
Skip to content