15 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 1055a
Insurance — Personal injury protection — Discovery — Privilege — Work product — Trial court departed from essential requirements of law, resulting in irreparable harm to provider, when it concluded that insurer was not required to produce adjuster’s AS400 computerized notes generated before insurer received provider’s presuit demand letter because provider did not establish a valid need for the notes to establish that treatment of insured was reasonable, related, and necessary — Trial court applied wrong evidentiary burden when analyzing insurer’s invocation of work-product privilege — Had insurer stated that it prepared AS400 notes in anticipation of litigation, burden would have shifted to provider to demonstrate that i]t had need of the materials in preparation of case and was unable without undue hardship to obtain substantial equivalent by other means — Discussion of procedural requirements and evidentiary burdens when one party invokes work-product privilege, including fact that Florida requires privilege logs when litigant claims work-product privilege and that failure to comply with this requirement results in waiver of privilege — Remand for evidentiary hearing consistent with requirements of rule 1.280(b)(3)