Volume 16

16 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 446a

Online Reference: FLWSUPP 165AMAD2

Insurance — Personal injury protection — Withdrawal of benefits — Medical report issued by peer review physician does not raise issue of material fact to preclude summary judgment as to any bill for treatment pre-dating independent medical examination where there is no factual basis to support opinion, reporting physician did not examine insured or base report on examination of physician who performed IME, and reporting physician failed to set forth basis for opinions expressed — Report is further deficient because it conflicts with affidavit of IME physician, who concluded that further treatment was not necessary but did not opine that pre-IME bills were unnecessary, and because it was obtained in contemplation of litigation

16 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 446a

Online Reference: FLWSUPP 165AMAD2

Insurance — Personal injury protection — Withdrawal of benefits — Medical report issued by peer review physician does not raise issue of material fact to preclude summary judgment as to any bill for treatment pre-dating independent medical examination where there is no factual basis to support opinion, reporting physician did not examine insured or base report on examination of physician who performed IME, and reporting physician failed to set forth basis for opinions expressed — Report is further deficient because it conflicts with affidavit of IME physician, who concluded that further treatment was not necessary but did not opine that pre-IME bills were unnecessary, and because it was obtained in contemplation of litigation

16 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 446a

Online Reference: FLWSUPP 165AMAD2

Insurance — Personal injury protection — Withdrawal of benefits — Medical report issued by peer review physician does not raise issue of material fact to preclude summary judgment as to any bill for treatment pre-dating independent medical examination where there is no factual basis to support opinion, reporting physician did not examine insured or base report on examination of physician who performed IME, and reporting physician failed to set forth basis for opinions expressed — Report is further deficient because it conflicts with affidavit of IME physician, who concluded that further treatment was not necessary but did not opine that pre-IME bills were unnecessary, and because it was obtained in contemplation of litigation

16 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 446a

Online Reference: FLWSUPP 165AMAD2

Insurance — Personal injury protection — Withdrawal of benefits — Medical report issued by peer review physician does not raise issue of material fact to preclude summary judgment as to any bill for treatment pre-dating independent medical examination where there is no factual basis to support opinion, reporting physician did not examine insured or base report on examination of physician who performed IME, and reporting physician failed to set forth basis for opinions expressed — Report is further deficient because it conflicts with affidavit of IME physician, who concluded that further treatment was not necessary but did not opine that pre-IME bills were unnecessary, and because it was obtained in contemplation of litigation

16 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 446a

Online Reference: FLWSUPP 165AMAD2

Insurance — Personal injury protection — Withdrawal of benefits — Medical report issued by peer review physician does not raise issue of material fact to preclude summary judgment as to any bill for treatment pre-dating independent medical examination where there is no factual basis to support opinion, reporting physician did not examine insured or base report on examination of physician who performed IME, and reporting physician failed to set forth basis for opinions expressed — Report is further deficient because it conflicts with affidavit of IME physician, who concluded that further treatment was not necessary but did not opine that pre-IME bills were unnecessary, and because it was obtained in contemplation of litigation

16 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 446a

Online Reference: FLWSUPP 165AMAD2

Insurance — Personal injury protection — Withdrawal of benefits — Medical report issued by peer review physician does not raise issue of material fact to preclude summary judgment as to any bill for treatment pre-dating independent medical examination where there is no factual basis to support opinion, reporting physician did not examine insured or base report on examination of physician who performed IME, and reporting physician failed to set forth basis for opinions expressed — Report is further deficient because it conflicts with affidavit of IME physician, who concluded that further treatment was not necessary but did not opine that pre-IME bills were unnecessary, and because it was obtained in contemplation of litigation

16 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 446a

Online Reference: FLWSUPP 165AMAD2

Insurance — Personal injury protection — Withdrawal of benefits — Medical report issued by peer review physician does not raise issue of material fact to preclude summary judgment as to any bill for treatment pre-dating independent medical examination where there is no factual basis to support opinion, reporting physician did not examine insured or base report on examination of physician who performed IME, and reporting physician failed to set forth basis for opinions expressed — Report is further deficient because it conflicts with affidavit of IME physician, who concluded that further treatment was not necessary but did not opine that pre-IME bills were unnecessary, and because it was obtained in contemplation of litigation

16 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 446a

Online Reference: FLWSUPP 165AMAD2

Insurance — Personal injury protection — Withdrawal of benefits — Medical report issued by peer review physician does not raise issue of material fact to preclude summary judgment as to any bill for treatment pre-dating independent medical examination where there is no factual basis to support opinion, reporting physician did not examine insured or base report on examination of physician who performed IME, and reporting physician failed to set forth basis for opinions expressed — Report is further deficient because it conflicts with affidavit of IME physician, who concluded that further treatment was not necessary but did not opine that pre-IME bills were unnecessary, and because it was obtained in contemplation of litigation

16 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 446a

Online Reference: FLWSUPP 165AMAD2

Insurance — Personal injury protection — Withdrawal of benefits — Medical report issued by peer review physician does not raise issue of material fact to preclude summary judgment as to any bill for treatment pre-dating independent medical examination where there is no factual basis to support opinion, reporting physician did not examine insured or base report on examination of physician who performed IME, and reporting physician failed to set forth basis for opinions expressed — Report is further deficient because it conflicts with affidavit of IME physician, who concluded that further treatment was not necessary but did not opine that pre-IME bills were unnecessary, and because it was obtained in contemplation of litigation

16 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 446a

Online Reference: FLWSUPP 165AMAD2

Insurance — Personal injury protection — Withdrawal of benefits — Medical report issued by peer review physician does not raise issue of material fact to preclude summary judgment as to any bill for treatment pre-dating independent medical examination where there is no factual basis to support opinion, reporting physician did not examine insured or base report on examination of physician who performed IME, and reporting physician failed to set forth basis for opinions expressed — Report is further deficient because it conflicts with affidavit of IME physician, who concluded that further treatment was not necessary but did not opine that pre-IME bills were unnecessary, and because it was obtained in contemplation of litigation