fbpx

Volume 16

Case Search

UNITED AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, v. BROWARD REHAB CENTER, INC., ORTHOPEDIC CENTER OF SOUTH FLORIDA, P.A., A-1 OPEN MRI, INC., a/a/o GENITA LA FRANCE, Appellees.

16 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 633b

Online Reference: FLWSUPP 167LAFRA

Insurance — Personal injury protection — Withdrawal of benefits — Peer review report which states that reporting physician examined records from insured’s treating physician as well as those of two physicians who performed independent medical examinations was valid report to support withdrawal of benefits

Read More »

DEERBROOK INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, vs. PAUL A. ANDREWS, DDS., LMT, a/a/o Rosa Peralta, Appellee.

16 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 223b

Online Reference: FLWSUPP 163PERAL

Insurance — Personal injury protection — Coverage — Medical expenses — Exhaustion of policy limits — There is no requirement for insurer to reserve benefits for payment of disputed claims — Absent showing of bad faith, insurer is not liable for benefits, including interest, once benefits have been exhausted

Read More »

DAVID A. LIBERT, M.D.d/b/a FIRST CHOICE MEDICAL CENTER, As assignee of Marc McCorkle, Plaintiff, v. USAA CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant.

16 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 364a

Online Reference: FLWSUPP 164MCCOR

Insurance — Personal injury protection — Coverage — Exhaustion of policy limits — In absence of showing of bad faith, exhaustion of benefits extinguished any interest of insured and medical provider/assignee in benefits — There is no requirement that insurer set aside reserve fund for claims that are reduced or denied

Read More »

CHIROCORP, INC. (a/a/o Veronica Lema), Plaintiff, vs. BRISTOL WEST INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant.

16 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 444b

Online Reference: FLWSUPP 165LEMA

Insurance — Personal injury protection — Independent medical examination — Failure to attend — Where insured failed to attend IME that was condition precedent to filing suit, medical provider may not pursue benefits, even for treatment rendered and billed before IME date — No merit to arguments that policy that is more stringent than statute in requiring submission to IME as condition precedent to suit is invalid, that there was no notice of IME because certified mail was returned, that insurer waived IME no-show defense by failing to cite failure to attend IME on explanation of benefits, that policy conditions precedent are not applicable to claimant who is not named insured, that failure to attend IME bars recovery for subsequent treatment but is not condition precedent to entire suit, that notice which states insured may forfeit rights under policy by failing to attend IME rather than affirmatively stating that rights will be forfeited is insufficient, and that appearance at examination under oath is partial compliance that precludes summary judgment for failure to attend IME

Read More »

JAMES KING, an insured individual, by and through his assignee, BIGLEY & ASSOCIATES, P.A., d/b/a PREMIER ORTHOPEDICS OF ORLANDO, Plaintiff, v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant.

16 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 665a

Online Reference: FLWSUPP 167KING

Insurance — Personal injury protection — Coverage — Medical expenses — Statutory amendment altering amount paid to medical providers under PIP statute operates prospectively and applies to all policies in effect on or after January 1, 2008

Read More »
Skip to content