PRIME CARE CHIROPRACTIC CENTERS, P.A., as assignee of Darlene Woodard, Plaintiff, vs. USAA CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant.
19 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 402a
Online Reference: FLWSUPP 1905WOODInsurance — Personal injury protection — Attorney’s fees — Contingency risk multiplier — Expert testimony is sufficient to establish that medical provider would have difficulty finding competent counsel without possibility of multiplier; provider is not required to testify to actual difficulty confronted — Multiplier of 2.0 is justified where attorney was not able to mitigate risk of nonpayment, fee arrangement was pure contingency fee arrangement, underlying claims were relatively small, attorney recovered full amount demanded plus interest, insurer was “purpose-driven” opponent seeking to establish precedent regarding need for perfect disclosure and acknowledgment form, and likelihood of success at outset was 50% — Costs — Travel time for expert witness is not compensable — Question certified