fbpx

Volume 19

Case Search

PRIME CARE CHIROPRACTIC CENTERS, P.A., as assignee of Darlene Woodard, Plaintiff, vs. USAA CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant.

19 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 402a

Online Reference: FLWSUPP 1905WOODInsurance — Personal injury protection — Attorney’s fees — Contingency risk multiplier — Expert testimony is sufficient to establish that medical provider would have difficulty finding competent counsel without possibility of multiplier; provider is not required to testify to actual difficulty confronted — Multiplier of 2.0 is justified where attorney was not able to mitigate risk of nonpayment, fee arrangement was pure contingency fee arrangement, underlying claims were relatively small, attorney recovered full amount demanded plus interest, insurer was “purpose-driven” opponent seeking to establish precedent regarding need for perfect disclosure and acknowledgment form, and likelihood of success at outset was 50% — Costs — Travel time for expert witness is not compensable — Question certified

Read More »

GARRISON PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, vs. CRYSTAL LEVY, Appellee.

19 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 319b

Online Reference: FLWSUPP 1905LEVYInsurance — Personal injury protection — Attorney’s fees — Contingency risk multiplier — No merit to argument that multiplier cannot be applied when party seeking multiplier fails to personally testify that she had difficulty obtaining competent counsel — Expert testimony demonstrating that market required multiplier in order to obtain competent counsel was sufficient to support application of multiplier despite fact that insured did not testify that she had actual difficulty in obtaining competent counsel

Read More »

AFFIRMATIVE INS. CO., Appellant, vs. UNIVERSAL X-RAYS CORP., Appellee.

19 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 338a

Online Reference: FLWSUPP 1905AFFIInsurance — Attorney’s fees — Trial court lacked jurisdiction to award attorney’s fees to co-counsel for medical provider where provider’s other attorney settled case on behalf of provider and entered voluntary dismissal stating that each party would bear own attorney’s fees and costs, and co-counsel, who was unaware of settlement, did not assert claim for fees prior to entry of dismissal

Read More »

STAND UP MRI OF MIAMI, INC., a/a/o ANA MORENO, Plaintiff, v. UNITED AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant.

19 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 50c

Online Reference: FLWSUPP 1901MOREInsurance — Personal injury protection — Attorney’s fees — Application for attorney’s fees and costs filed by attorney who voluntarily withdrew from representation is denied where attorney failed to file notice of charging lien prior to entry of final judgment — Even if notice of charging lien had been filed, attorney who was employed pursuant to contingency fee agreement and voluntarily withdrew from representation prior to occurrence of contingency forfeited all rights to compensation

Read More »

UNITED AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, a Florida Corporation, Appellant, vs. DR. BRASS & SINGER, a/a/o SONY GERVE, et al, Appellee

19 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 220a

Online Reference: FLWSUPP 1904GERVInsurance — Personal injury protection — Attorney’s fees — Appellate — Voluntarily dismissed appeal — Medical provider/appellee’s failure to file motion for appellate fees prior to insurer’s voluntary dismissal of its appeal and failure to specify any basis for fee award in untimely motion for fees requires denial of request for appellate fees — De minimis nature of appellate efforts by provider also compels denial of request for appellate fees

Read More »

WIDE OPEN MRI, a/a/o Lenor Lara, Appellant-Plaintiff, v. UNITED AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee-Defendant.

19 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 973a

Online Reference: FLWSUPP 1912LARAInsurance — Personal injury protection — Dismissal — Error to dismiss statement of claim with prejudice as being barred by res judicata or collateral estoppel based on voluntary dismissal of prior litigation where voluntary dismissal of prior litigation was not referenced in claim or attachments to claim — Award of appellate attorney’s fees to prevailing medical provider is automatically conditioned, by controlling, precedent on provider ultimately prevailing with recovery on policy

Read More »

UNITED AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, vs. COMPREHENSIVE HEALTH CENTER, LLC, (a/a/o Jean J. Aspilaire), Appellee.

19 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 71a

Online Reference: FLWSUPP 1902ASPIInsurance — Personal injury protection — Attorney’s fees — Amount — No abuse of discretion in awarding $25 per hour rate increase to medical provider’s attorney where decision was supported by competent substantial evidence in form of expert testimony — Appellate fees — Justiciable issues — Appellate attorney’s fees are awarded to provider where insurer’s decision to appeal rate increase was not supported by facts or law

Read More »
Skip to content