20 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 54a
Online Reference: FLWSUPP 2001HISCInsurance — Professional indemnity — Declaratory judgment — Comity — First-filed rule — Insurers move to dismiss count of Florida action seeking declaration regarding coverage for punitive damages, brought by plaintiff that was awarded compensatory and punitive damages against an insured auditing firm in a Florida court, based on a prior summary judgment entered in the insurers’ New York declaratory judgment action against the insured, which concluded that New York law governed pursuant to the parties’ stipulation and that punitive damages were not covered by policies under New York law — First-filed rule is not applicable where neither parties nor issues in actions are sufficiently similar to justify imposition of rule — Parties are not sufficiently similar where plaintiff to whom damages were owed was not party to New York case, and insured acted against own interests to detriment of plaintiff’s rights in that case by agreeing that New York law, which recognizes no exception to general rule that punitive damages, are not insurable would control — Issues are not sufficiently similar where choice of law may be different in each action — Further, due process concerns raised by parties’ conduct in New York proceeding are special circumstances that warrant departure from first-filed rule — Due process concerns also preclude giving res judicata effect to New York judgment