Volume 20

Case Search

ADVANCED 3-D DIAGNOSTIC, a/a/o ZIKY JEANNESTIN, Plaintiff, v. STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY, Defendant.

20 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 1082a

Online Reference: FLWSUPP 2011JEANInsurance — Personal injury protection — Standing — Assignment — Document that assigns benefits but fails to transfer insured’s rights in PIP policy is direction to pay, not assignment — No merit to argument that insurer lacks standing to challenge assignment where insurer is not challenging validity of agreement between insured and medical provider, but contesting that agreement constitutes assignment — Motion to dismiss is granted

Read More »

PROFESSIONAL DIAGNOSTIC READING A/A/O WILNEL TELSAINT, Plaintiff, vs. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant.

20 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 700a

Online Reference: FLWSUPP 2007TELSInsurance — Personal injury protection — Standing — Assignment — Motion to dismiss is not proper means to challenge standing — Where intent of insured and medical provider to enter into assignment is clear from provider’s action in bringing suit for PIP benefits and insured’s failure to bring suit or object to provider’s suit, there is equitable assignment — Assignment need not be signed by provider where provider accepted terms of assignment through provision of services — Document that authorizes insurer to make payments directly to provider, but states that insured remains responsible for any amounts not paid, is unqualified assignment

Read More »

RESTORATION 1 OF MIAMI, INC., (A/A/O CARTER, DIANNE), Plaintiff, vs. USAA CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant.

20 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 1214a

Online Reference: FLWSUPP 2012CARTInsurance — Homeowners — Standing — Assignment — Company that provided water removal and construction services on homeowner’s property does not have standing to bring action against insurer where purported assignment of benefits clearly provides that insured retains all insurance rights, benefits and proceeds under policy — Complaint is dismissed without leave to amend

Read More »

ALL DRY WATER RESTORATION a/a/o JAIME DE FREITAS, Plaintiff, vs. HOMEOWNERS CHOICE PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, INC., Defendant.

20 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 1002a

Online Reference: FLWSUPP 2010DEFRInsurance — Homeowners — Standing — Assignment — Company that provided water remediation services on homeowner’s property has standing to bring action against insurer for breach of contract — Anti-assignment provision in homeowner’s policy does not apply to assignment after loss — Motion to dismiss is denied

Read More »

ANDERSON RESTORATION & EMERGENCY SERVICES LLC a/a/o Phyllis Smith, Plaintiff, vs. FLORIDA PENINSULA INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant.

20 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 798b

Online Reference: FLWSUPP 2008PSMIInsurance — Homeowners — Standing — Assignment — Company that provided water extraction service on homeowner’s flooded property has standing to bring action against insurer for unpaid balance of claim for company’s services — Anti-assignment provision in homeowner’s policy does not apply to assignment after loss — Motion to dismiss is denied

Read More »

GRAHAM’S CARPET CLEANING & RESTORATION a/a/o Neilda Childers, Appellant, vs. ROYAL PALM INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee.

20 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 865a

Online Reference: FLWSUPP 2009CHILInsurance — Homeowners — Assignment — Water mitigation company/assignee action against insurer that paid benefits to insured — Assignment of homeowner’s rights under policy after property loss was incurred is valid irrespective of policy provision prohibiting assignment without consent of insurer — Assignment of all insurance rights, benefits and proceeds is full assignment, not partial assignment — Insurer that had notice of valid assignment is liable for payment of services rendered by water mitigation company despite having already paid policy limits for water damage to insured

Read More »
Skip to content