OAKLAND PARK MRI, INC. (a/a/o Chad Terpstra), Plaintiff(s), vs. MERCURY INSURANCE COMPANY OF FLORIDA, Defendant(s).
20 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 586a
Online Reference: FLWSUPP 2006TERPInsurance — Personal injury protection — Coverage — Medical expenses — By using confusing language providing for payment of 80% of reasonable expenses while also referencing “other payment guidelines in No Fault Law,” “any schedule and limitations under federal or state law for medical expenses,” and “various sources of information” to determine if medical expense is “reasonable,” insurer failed to satisfy requirement that election to use permissive statutory fee schedule be made in manner so that insured and medical providers would be aware of it