STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, v. HYMA MEDICAL CENTER, INC. a/a/o Jorge Pino a/a/o Sadys Lopez, Appellee.
20 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 120a
Online Reference: FLWSUPP 2002PINOInsurance — Personal injury protection — Denial of claim — Valid medical report — No abuse of discretion in declining to consider peer review report that contains mere conclusions as to reasonableness, relatedness and necessity of treatment and does not create factual issue precluding summary judgment — Affirmative defenses — Amendment — No merit to claim that trial court exceeded appellate mandate requiring reconsideration of motion for summary judgment on issues of reasonableness, relatedness and necessity of treatment by allowing insurer to amend its affirmative defenses to assert claim that medical provider submitted false or misleading disclosure and acknowledgment form where court ruled on motion for summary judgment prior to considering motion to amend — No abuse of discretion in allowing insurer to amend affirmative defenses where provider that did not require extensive preparation to prevail on affirmative defense was not prejudiced by amendment — Trial court correctly found that D&A form defense was legally insufficient where insurer failed to bring deficiencies in form to provider’s attention, and insurer chose not to raise defense of fraud under insurance fraud statute