Volume 21

Case Search

HOWARD GOLDING and BETH GOLDING, Plaintiffs/Counter-Defendants and Third-Party Defendants, v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant/Counter-Claimant and Third-Party Plaintiff.

21 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 66a

Online Reference: FLWSUPP 2101GOLDInsurance — Stacking — Uninsured/underinsured motorist — Where insureds’ policy clearly and unambiguously excludes stacking of uninsured/underinsured motorist coverage, and statute provides that limitations accepted by insureds will continue unless insureds request deletion of limitation and pay appropriate premium for additional coverage. insurer was not obligated to provide stacking coverage at non-stacking rate when insureds notified insurer that they wanted to revoke written election against stacked coverage and insurer failed to provide premium statement showing increased charge for increased coverage

Read More »

UNITED RECONSTRUCTION GROUP, INC., a/a/o Avilio Morales, Plaintiff, vs. FLORIDA FAMILY INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant.

21 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 571a

Online Reference: FLWSUPP 2106MORAInsurance — Property — Appraisal — Insurer’s motion to abate litigation and compel appraisal is denied as to invoiced items that were entirely omitted from comparative estimate and is granted as to invoiced items for which comparative estimate assigned price different from price charged by plaintiff

Read More »

STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff, vs. ASCENDANT COMMERCIAL INSURANCE, INC. AND SOMIR HEALTHCARE TRANSPORTATION, INC., Defendants.

21 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 576b

Online Reference: FLWSUPP 2106ASCEInsurance — Personal injury protection — Reimbursement by insurer of commercial vehicle — Where insured of PIP carrier was injured while operating taxicab which was insured under commercial liability policy, PIP carrier is entitled to reimbursement of PIP benefits paid pursuant to section 627.7405, which allows for reimbursement of PIP carriers of private passenger vehicles by insurer of commercial vehicles involved in accident — Taxicab is commercial motor vehicle — By terms of PIP statute, right of reimbursement remains applicable notwithstanding section 627.733(1)(b), which excludes taxicabs from security requirements of No-Fault Law

Read More »

STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff, vs. CITY OF WINTER HAVEN, Defendant.

21 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 576a

Online Reference: FLWSUPP 2106CITYInsurance — Personal injury protection — Reimbursement by insurer of commercial vehicle — Sedan-style police cruiser owned and operated by city qualifies as commercial vehicle under statute — Literal application of definition of private passenger motor vehicle in PIP statute would result in absurd result of excluding police cruiser from definition of commercial vehicle

Read More »

UNITED AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE, COMPANY, Appellant, v. PALM REHABILITATION, INC., A/A/O MIGUEL DESDIN, Appellee.

21 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 307a

Online Reference: FLWSUPP 2104DESDInsurance — Personal injury protection — Jurors — Challenge — No abuse of discretion in denying challenge for cause exercised against juror on basis of her background as physical therapist — Abuse of discretion to deny peremptory challenges against jurors where insurer asserted jurors may not be fair and impartial, and medical provider did not assert that challenges were being used in racially discriminatory manner — New trial required

Read More »
Skip to content