Volume 22

Case Search

FLORIDA WELLNESS & REHAB CENTER, INC., (a/a/o Pedro Barrios), Plaintiff, vs. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant.

22 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 627a

Online Reference: FLWSUPP 2205BARRInsurance — Personal injury protection — Coverage — Medical expenses — Reasonableness of charges — Summary judgment — Opposing affidavits filed by insurer do not preclude summary judgment in favor of medical provider on issue of reasonableness of medical charge where affidavits are conclusory and self-serving — Fact that Medicare, workers’ compensation, and health insurance pay less than amount billed by provider is insufficient to create triable issue as to reasonableness of charge

Read More »

HALLANDALE OPEN MRI, LLC, as assignee of Jean Wilkens Saint-Ange, Plaintiff, vs. UNITED AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant

22 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 149a

Online Reference: FLWSUPP 2201SAINInsurance — Personal injury protection — Summary judgment — Reasonableness of charges — Medical provider met its burden of proving charge for MRI was reasonable — Opposing affidavit of non-expert that is conclusory and lacks foundation for affiant’s opinion is insufficient to create genuine issue of material fact and avoid summary judgment

Read More »

HALLANDALE OPEN MRI, LLC as assignee of Mickael Cohen, Plaintiff, vs. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant.

22 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 140a

Online Reference: FLWSUPP 2201COHEInsurance — Personal injury protection — Summary judgment — Reasonableness of charges — Medical provider met its burden of proving charge for MRI was reasonable — Opposing affidavit of non-expert that is self-serving and conclusory is insufficient to create genuine issue of material fact and avoid summary judgment

Read More »

MILLENNIUM RADIOLOGY, LLC, as assignee of Carmen Ruiz, Plaintiff, vs. UNITED AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant.

22 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 136b

Online Reference: FLWSUPP 2201RUIZInsurance — Personal injury protection — Summary disposition — Reasonableness of charges — Medical provider met its burden of proving charges for MRI and CAT scans were reasonable — Opposing affidavit of non-expert that is conclusory and lacks foundation for affiant’s opinion is insufficient to create genuine issue of material fact and avoid summary disposition

Read More »

PAN AM DIAGNOSTICS SERVICES INC., d/b/a WIDE OPEN MRI, as assignee of Svetlana Pimanova, Plaintiff, vs. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant.

22 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 650a

Online Reference: FLWSUPP 2205PIMAInsurance — Personal injury protection — Coverage — Medical expenses — Reasonableness of charges — Summary disposition — Opposing affidavit filed by insurer does not preclude summary disposition in favor of medical provider on issue of reasonableness of MRI charges where affidavit is conclusory and lacks foundation, and affiant is not qualified to render opinion on reasonableness of charge — Fact that Medicare, workers’ compensation and health insurance pay less than amount billed by provider does not, by itself, create factual issue as to reasonableness of charge

Read More »

PALMS MRI DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING CENTERS, INC, as assignee of Frank Sirker, Plaintiff, vs. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant.

22 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 393b

Online Reference: FLWSUPP 2203SIRKInsurance — Personal injury protection — Coverage — Medical expenses — Reasonableness of charges — Summary judgment — Opposing affidavit filed by insurer does not preclude summary judgment in favor of medical provider on issue of reasonableness of MRI charge where affidavit is conclusory and lacks foundation, and affiant is not qualified to render opinion on reasonableness of charge — Fact that Medicare, workers’ compensation, and other payors pay less than amount billed by provider does not, by itself, create factual issue as to reasonableness of charge

Read More »

COASTAL RADIOLOGY, LLC., (Manuel Marono), Plaintiff(s), vs. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant(s).

22 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 166a

Online Reference: FLWSUPP 2201MAROInsurance — Personal injury protection — Coverage — Medical expenses — Reasonableness of charges — Summary judgment — Opposing affidavits filed by insurer do not preclude summary judgment in favor of medical provider on issue of reasonableness of MRI charges where affiants are not qualified to render opinion on reasonableness of charges and opinions are not based upon sufficient facts or data, are not product of reliable principles or methods and do not reflect reliable application of principles and methods to facts

Read More »

PALMS MRI DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING CENTERS, INC., as assignee of Steven Horrigan, Plaintiff, vs. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant.

22 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 138a

Online Reference: FLWSUPP 2201HORRInsurance — Personal injury protection — Coverage — Medical expenses — Reasonableness of charges — Summary disposition — Opposing affidavit filed by insurer does not preclude summary disposition in favor of medical provider on issue of reasonableness of MRI charge where affidavit is conclusory and lacks foundation, and affiant is not qualified to render opinion on reasonableness of charge — Fact that Medicare, workers’ compensation, and health insurance pay less than amount billed by provider does not, by itself, create factual issue as to reasonableness of charge

Read More »

HALLANDALE OPEN MRI, LLC, as assignee of Alvis Afanador, Plaintiff, vs. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant.

22 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 132c

Online Reference: FLWSUPP 2201AFANInsurance — Personal injury protection — Coverage — Medical expenses — Reasonableness of charges — Summary disposition — Opposing affidavit filed by insurer does not preclude summary disposition in favor of medical provider on issue of reasonableness of MRI charge where affidavit is conclusory and lacks foundation, and affiant is not qualified to render opinion on reasonableness of charge — Fact that Medicare and health insurance pay less than amount billed by provider does not, by itself, create factual issue as to reasonableness of charge

Read More »
Skip to content