Volume 22

Case Search

T.S. MEDICAL HEALTH, INC. A/A/O CARLOS LICOR, Plaintiff, v. PROGRESSIVE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant.

22 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 466a

Online Reference: FLWSUPP 2204LICOInsurance — Discovery — Depositions — Failure to appear — Sanctions — Where corporate representative for medical provider failed to appear for two prior depositions, provider sought protective order from latest scheduled deposition on grounds that representative was out of town, but failed to comply with order to fax travel documents to court to verify that representative was on pre-planned trip, and representative failed to appear for deposition, provider’s pleadings are stricken and case is dismissed

Read More »

NEUROLOGY PARTNERS, P.A., as assignee of ANTHONY PARKER, Plaintiff, v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant.

22 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 597b

Online Reference: FLWSUPP 2205PARKInsurance — Personal injury protection — Discovery — Depositions — Expert witness fee — Treating physician who is owner of plaintiff medical provider is entitled to witness fee for deposition testimony where plaintiff brought action against insurer pursuant to assignment of benefits

Read More »

NEUROLOGY PARTNERS, P.A. As Assignee of Timothy Adams, Plaintiff, vs. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant.

22 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 597a

Online Reference: FLWSUPP 2205TADAInsurance — Personal injury protection — Discovery — Depositions — Expert witness fee — Treating physician who is owner of plaintiff medical provider is entitled to expert witness fee for deposition testimony where plaintiff brought action against insurer pursuant to assignment of benefits

Read More »

UNITED AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY Appellant(s), vs. PROFESSIONAL MEDICAL GROUP, INC., a/a/o GERALDO LANDAVERDE, Appellee(s).

22 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 186a

Online Reference: FLWSUPP 2202LANDInsurance — Personal injury protection — Discovery — Depositions — No abuse of discretion in awarding expert witness fee for deposition testimony of treating physician — Trial court erred in disregarding peer review and affidavit of physician who conducted independent medical examination because they were obtained after PIP suit was filed and, consequently, erred in entering summary judgment in favor of medical provider — Insurer may assert that treatment was not reasonable, related or necessary at any time

Read More »
Skip to content