fbpx

Volume 22

Case Search

STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Petitioner, v. COLLISION CONCEPTS, INC., A/A/O JOHN BROWER, Respondent. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Petitioner, v. COLLISION CONCEPTS, INC., A/A/O TRACY PARSONS, Respondent. Case Nos. 502014CA007531XXXXMB & 502014CA007600XXXXMB. L.T. Case Nos. 502012SC009988XXXXMB & 502012SC009995XXXXMB.

22 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 792a

Online Reference: FLWSUPP 2207BROWInsurance — Automobile — Discovery — Trade secret privilege — Trial court departed from essential requirements of law in compelling disclosure of competitive pricing survey relied upon by insurer in making estimate of cost of automobile repair work without determining whether survey constituted trade secret and, if so, whether there was reasonable necessity for production

Read More »

ALTAMONTE SPRINGS DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING, INC. d/b/a MID FLORIDA IMAGING a/a/o JOSE VAZQUEZ, Plaintiff, v. FIRST FLORIDIAN AUTO AND HOME INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant.

22 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 269c

Online Reference: FLWSUPP 2202VAZQInsurance — Personal injury protection — Attorney’s fees — Proposal for settlement — Nominal proposal — Good faith — Where there is nothing in record to indicate that policy limits had been exhausted at time insurer served nominal proposal for settlement or that insurer otherwise had little or no exposure in case at that time, proposal was not made in good faith — Insurer’s motion for attorney’s fees and costs is denied

Read More »

HEALTH USA CORPORATION, a/a/o Kenia Gonzalez, Appellant-Plaintiff, v. U.S. SECURITY INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee-Defendant.

22 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 311a

Online Reference: FLWSUPP 2203KEGOInsurance — Coverage — Relatedness of injury — No error to deny motion for directed verdict on issue of relatedness of claimant’s injuries to automobile accident where jury could have concluded that, because no documentation indicated that claimant’s right shoulder and arm impacted vehicle, pain on claimant’s right side was not related to accident — Attorney’s fees — Settlement proposal that indicated insurer’s intent to avoid resolving attorney’s fees is not ambiguous as to entitlement to fees — Appellate fees — Although insurer consistently requested appellate attorney’s fees under section 768.79(3), which does not provide substantive basis for awarding fees, appellate court overlooks error and grants motion for fees under section 768.79(1)

Read More »

A-1 IMAGING CENTERS, LLC (a/a/o MARISSA KIM), Plaintiff(s), vs. USAA GENERAL INDEMNITY COMPANY, Defendant(s).

22 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 961a

Online Reference: FLWSUPP 2208KIMInsurance — Personal injury protection — Coverage — Emergency medical condition — Declaratory action — Under amendments to PIP statute requiring PIP insurer to pay benefits up to $10,000 if qualified medical provider has determined that claimant had emergency medical condition and limiting reimbursement to $2,500 if qualified provider has determined that claimant did not have emergency medical condition, benefits are limited to $2,500 in absence of determination by qualified provider that emergency medical condition exists — Proposal for settlement and motion for attorney’s fees are stricken where provider does not seek monetary damages and will not recover any wrongfully withheld benefits

Read More »

LAKE WORTH EMERGENCY CHIROPRACTIC CENTER PA AS ASSIGNEE OF, Plaintiff(s), v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant(s).

22 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 956a

Online Reference: FLWSUPP 2208LAKEInsurance — Personal injury protection — Attorney’s fees — Proposal for settlement — Despite fact that insurer’s proposal for settlement was submitted before insurer amended its answer and affirmative defenses to assert demand letter issue on which it ultimately prevailed, where medical provider has made no showing that settlement offer was not made in good faith, insurer is entitled to award of attorney’s fees and costs

Read More »
Skip to content