Volume 22

Case Search

NEUROLOGY PARTNERS, P.A. D/B/A EMAS SPINE & BRAIN A/A/O SCOTT BRAY, Plaintiff, v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant.

22 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 101b

Online Reference: FLWSUPP 2201BRAYInsurance — Personal injury protection — Demand letter — Sufficiency — PIP statute does not require that demand letter account for prior payments made by insurer or attempt to state exact amount owed by insurer — By attaching itemized statement to demand letter, medical provider complied with requirements of section 627.736(10) — Compliant demand letter is not rendered non-compliant by provision of additional information that is mathematically inconsistent with itemized statement — Insurer waived any deficiencies in demand letter by failing to object to letter prior to filing of suit

Read More »

MCGOWAN SPINAL REHAB CENTER A/A/O JAYNELL CAMERON, Plaintiff, v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant.

22 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 708a

Online Reference: FLWSUPP 2206CAMEInsurance — Personal injury protection — Demand letter — Sufficiency — PIP statute does not require that demand letter calculate exact amount owed by insurer — By attaching itemized statement to demand letter, medical provider satisfied requirements of section 627.736(10) — Mathematical errors or inconsistencies relating to prior payments made by insurer does not void otherwise compliant demand letter

Read More »

LUVENIA TATUM, Plaintiff, vs. MERCURY INSURANCE COMPANY OF FLORIDA, Defendant.

22 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 705a

Online Reference: FLWSUPP 2206TATUInsurance — Personal injury protection — Demand letter — Waiver — Upon determining that insured did not send demand letter to person or address specified by insurer for receipt of demand letters, court reconsiders and reverses finding that insurer waived demand letter defense by failing to respond to demand letter — Abatement — PIP case is abated to allow insured to issue valid demand letter — If insurer pays amount demanded, insured shall file voluntary dismissal and will not be entitled to attorney’s fees and costs

Read More »

RADIOLOGY REGIONAL CENTER, P.A. a/a/o RAUL BLANCO, Plaintiff, vs. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant.

22 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 1111d

Online Reference: FLWSUPP 2209BLANInsurance — Personal injury protection — Coverage — Owner of vehicle for which security was required by law — Inoperable vehicle — Where documents demonstrate that claimant who was injured while passenger in vehicle owned by his father-in-law owned a registered and insured vehicle at time of accident, claimant’s vehicle required some repair work but was never in storage and was driveable, and claimant intended to repair and maintain vehicle for use, claimant’s vehicle was not inoperable — Summary judgment is entered in favor of insurer

Read More »
Skip to content