Volume 23

Case Search

BLUE MEDICAL NETWORK, INC., (A/A/O TROCHE, JIMMY), Plaintiff, vs. PROGRESSIVE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant.

23 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 174b

Online Reference: FLWSUPP 2302TROCInsurance — Personal injury protection — Coverage — Medical expenses — Lawfully rendered treatment — It is outside purview of court to make determination that provider did not comply with Health Care Clinic Act, including medical or clinical director compliance, absent a finding from the Agency for Health Care Administration that the provider had been in violation of the statute at the time the services at issue were rendered — Affirmative defense of noncompliance remains issue for trier of fact — Defendant’s motion for summary judgment denied

Read More »

TROPICAL HEALING POWER, LLC, as assignee of Heriberto Mons, Plaintiff, v. PROGRESSIVE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant.

23 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 176b

Online Reference: FLWSUPP 2302MONSInsurance — Personal injury protection — Coverage — Lawfully rendered services — Where, during time that services were rendered to insured, medical provider falsely identified licensed massage therapist as its owner in order to circumvent licensure requirements of Health Care Clinic Act, services were not lawfully rendered and neither insurer nor insured is liable for charges — Further, neither insurer nor insured is required to pay claim to provider that knowingly submitted false and misleading claims

Read More »

DORAL MEDICAL REHAB CENTER, INC., A/A/O FERNANDO PEREZ, Plaintiff, v. PROGRESSIVE EXPRESS INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant.

23 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 762a

Online Reference: FLWSUPP 2307PEREInsurance — Personal injury protection — Coverage — Lawfully rendered services — Evidence — Judicial notice — Insurer’s request for compulsory judicial notice of final order of state board of medicine barring treating physician from practice of medicine is granted where medical provider has been given sufficient notice of request to enable it to meet request

Read More »

BLUE MEDICAL NETWORK, INC. A/A/O ESTRELLA MEDINA, Plaintiff, v. PROGRESSIVE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant.

23 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 1061a

Online Reference: FLWSUPP 2310MEDIInsurance — Personal injury protection — Coverage — Medical expenses — Lawfully rendered services — Insurer had no obligation to pay clinic whose medical director was not performing her statutorily mandated duties — Court rejects plaintiff’s position that only the Agency for Health Care Administration can find clinic in violation of statute

Read More »

PEAK PROP. & CAS. INS. CO., Appellant, v. SPORTS IMAGING CTRS., LLC, d/b/a WINDSOR IMAGING a/a/o HERBERT TOWLER, Appellee.

23 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 910a

Online Reference: FLWSUPP 2309TOWLInsurance — Personal injury protection — Answer — Amendment — Abuse of discretion to deny insurer leave to amend answer and affirmative defenses where allowing amendment would not prejudice medical provider since no trial date had been set, insurer had only been afforded opportunity to amend once, and amendments were not futile — Jurisdiction — County court did not err in denying motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction where amount in controversy in PIP case is less than $900 — Summary judgment — Opposing affidavit — Error to strike opposing affidavit of insurer’s witness due to delay in disclosure of expert — Supreme court precedent governing striking of witnesses testifying at trial not basis for striking affidavit in opposition to summary judgment — Insurer that complied with requirements of rule 1.510 in serving opposing affidavit on provider should have been allowed to present affidavit, and summary judgment should not have been entered

Read More »

OPEN MAGNETIC SCANNING, LTD. d/b/a WINDSOR IMAGING, a/a/o Pearl Francis, Plaintiff(s), vs. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant.

23 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 872a

Online Reference: FLWSUPP 2308FRANInsurance — Personal injury protection — Coverage — Exhaustion of policy limits — Where insurer sent global settlement check to medical provider’s attorneys that intermixed benefits with attorney’s fees, costs and interest without any explanation of how check would be apportioned, there is no evidence that benefits have been exhausted

Read More »
Skip to content