Volume 24

Case Search

UNITED AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, v. PARTNERS IN HEALTH CHIROPRACTIC CENTER, (a/a/o Cecilia Yanique Gerlin), Appellee.

24 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 785a

Online Reference: FLWSUPP 2410GERLInsurance — Personal injury protection — Attorney’s fees — Proposal for settlement — In absence of transcript of pertinent proceedings below, appellate court cannot conclude that trial court abused its discretion in denying motion for attorney’s fees based on finding that insurer’s proposal for settlement, which totaled $500 for medical benefits and attorney’s fees and which was rejected by plaintiff, was not made in good faith, notwithstanding fact that jury ultimately returned verdict for insurer, finding that injuries were not related to accident

Read More »

STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, vs. SOUTH FLORIDA MEDICAL HEALTH CENTER, INC., A/A/O PENTON, LUIS, Appellee

24 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 21c

Online Reference: FLWSUPP 2401LUISInsurance — Personal injury protection — Proposal for settlement — Timeliness of acceptance — Section 768.79(1) and rule 1.442(f)(1) require that proposal for settlement be accepted within 30 days — Medical provider’s motion for enlargement of time to respond to proposal did not toll time for acceptance where insurer did not agree to enlargement of time and provider did not obtain order granting enlargement of time prior to expiration of time for acceptance — Order enforcing settlement is reversed

Read More »

HOLLYWOOD DIAGNOSTICS CENTER a/a/o Barbara C. Lindsey, Plaintiff, vs. STAR CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant.

24 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 708b

Online Reference: FLWSUPP 2409LINDInsurance — Personal injury protection — Attorney’s fees — Proposal for settlement — Where medical provider rejected proposal for settlement and thereafter filed notice of voluntary dismissal, insurer is entitled to award of attorney’s fees and costs — Burden is on provider to prove that insurer did not make proposal in good faith — Issue of whether provider acted reasonably in rejecting proposal has no bearing on insurer’s entitlement to fee award

Read More »

SOUTH FLORIDA MC, INC., a/a/o MARIA LEON, Plaintiff, v. PROGRESSIVE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant.

24 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 75a

Online Reference: FLWSUPP 2401LEONInsurance — Personal injury protection — Attorney’s fees — Proposal for settlement — Where medical provider voluntarily dismissed prior PIP case and years later filed identical claim in new case, insurer served $100 proposal for settlement in new case, and thereafter plaintiff dismissed new case, insurer is entitled to award of attorney’s fees and costs

Read More »

PRECISION DIAGNOSTIC OF LAKE WORTH, LLC (a/a/o Daniel Molina), Plaintiff, v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant.

24 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 868a

Online Reference: FLWSUPP 2410MOLIInsurance — Personal injury protection — Attorney’s fees — Where medical provider recovered only penalties and postage as result of insurer’s confession of judgment, and all PIP benefits were paid pre-suit, provider is not entitled to award of attorney’s fees under section 627.428

Read More »

SUZANNE JOHNSON, Plaintiff, v. SOUTHERN-OWNERS INSURANCE COMPANY, a foreign corporation, Defendant.

24 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 167a

Online Reference: FLWSUPP 2402SUZAInsurance — Personal injury protection — Attorney’s fees — Declaratory action — Insured who prevailed in declaratory action determining that insurer is obligated to provide PIP and medical payment coverage is entitled to award of attorney’s fees under section 627.428(1) notwithstanding fact that insured did not seek money damages

Read More »
Skip to content