26 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 681a
Online Reference: FLWSUPP 2608EDWAInsurance — Automobile — Windshield replacement — Limitation of liability — Where insurer did not present any evidence of prices that are prevailing and competitive or of method for calculating what windshield replacement service would cost in competitive market at time of loss, insurer failed to prove that its liability is limited under policy clause limiting liability to prevailing competitive price to repair or replace property at time of loss — Standing — Assignment — No merit to argument that assignment of benefits to repair shop was insufficient — Equitable estoppel — Argument that repair shop was equitably estopped from recovering more than prevailing competitive price where it performed work despite being aware from course of dealings with insurer that insurer would not pay more than prevailing competitive price fails where insurer did not present evidence that repair shop represented that it accepted insurer’s pricing limits, that insurer relied on any such representation or that insurer changed its position in detrimental reliance on any such representation — Waiver — No merit to argument that repair shop waived right to seek additional benefits by performing work after receiving document that stated insurer’s pricing limits and that performance of services constituted acceptance of price where insurer offered no evidence that repair shop intended to relinquish right to charge what it deemed necessary to replace windshield — Instead, evidence showed that shop immediately notified insurer through its invoice that it did not accept insurer’s pricing limits and has constantly reminded insurer of its intention not to accept those limits through series of lawsuits — Repair shop’s motion for directed verdict is granted