27 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 296a
Online Reference: FLWSUPP 2703DMARInsurance — Personal injury protection — Demand letter — Sufficiency — Demand letter with attached itemized statement complied with PIP statute — No merit to claim that demand letter was premature because provider did not respond to insurer’s request for documentation where explanation of reimbursement that disputed timeliness of bills but did not request any documentation regarding reasonableness charges or necessity of treatment is not valid request and, even if valid, request that was issued more than 30 days after receipt of bills was untimely — No merit to claim that demand letter is premature because insurer did not receive bills for all charges demanded where it is only relevant that provider sent bills, not whether insurer received bills, and record shows that insurer did receive bills