27 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 400a
Online Reference: FLWSUPP 2704WELCInsurance — Personal injury protection — Attorney’s fees — Proposal for settlement is not valid where complaint alleged both monetary and non-monetary claims — Although medical provider did not formally plead claim for declaratory judgment, allegations of complaint indisputably demonstrate that provider was seeking declaration of its rights under statutory provisions allegedly violated by PIP insurer, and claim for declaration of rights was not subsumed within breach of contract claim — Ambiguity — Proposal language requiring provider to “fully settle and dismiss all direct claims and causes of action pled by or available to plaintiff” is ambiguous where language could extinguish provider’s right to any portion of recovery in insured’s bodily injury suit — Further, nominal proposal was not made in good faith where issue of whether exhaustion of benefits after making a reduced payment that is later determined to be unlawful was proper was being hotly litigated at time insurer made offer, so that insurer only had 50% chance of prevailing on this issue at time of offer — Insurer’s motion for entitlement to attorney’s fees is denied