Volume 9

Case Search

JOSEPH CICCARELLO, D.C., P.A. (As Assignee of Vonda Larson), Plaintiff, vs. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant.

9 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 137a

Insurance — Dispute between medical provider and insurer — Summary judgment entered for insurer where insured paid total outstanding balance alleged in suit to plaintiff medical provider prior to filing of suit — Attorney’s fees — Justiciable issues — Attorney’s fees awarded to insurer where it should have been readily apparent from a review of file that plaintiff medical provider had been paid in full before suit was filed

Read More »

BERNADETTE ISHIKAWA, Plaintiff, vs. ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant.

9 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 247a

Insurance — Personal injury protection — Discovery — Insurer is ordered to produce insured’s claim file except documents in privilege log, personnel files of all employees who worked on insured’s file, and all manuals and other items that constitute instructions to adjusters with respect to handling PIP claims — Request for entire file of insurer’s attorneys in underlying PIP action is denied

Read More »

JOSH OSCAR, Plaintiff, vs. PROGRESSIVE EXPRESS INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant.

9 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 324b

Insurance — Discovery — Work product — “Face sheet notes” generated over time by adjusters and other insurance company personnel reviewing plaintiff’s claim and retained in defendant’s computer system — Insurer to produce face sheet notes generated prior to certain date because no evidence of any intent to question plaintiff’s claims appears in the notes prior to that date — Motion to compel denied with regard to face sheet notes which were generated after specified date and which concern insurer’s decision to request compulsory medical examination and, eventually, to terminate coverage

Read More »

VIVIAN HAYES, Plaintiff, vs. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant.

9 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 851c

Insurance — Personal injury protection — Discovery — Third-party vendor that coordinates and schedules independent medical examinations, medical expense reviews, and peer reviews is ordered to respond to subpoena to produce documents setting forth policy used in reviews and IMEs, contracts between vendor and insurer for conducting IMEs and reviews, documents reflecting payments made by vendor to physician and payments made by insurer to vendor related to insured’s claim, and documents reflecting payments made by vendor to physician for past four years

Read More »
Skip to content