BANKERS SECURITY INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant/Cross-Appellee, v. ROBERT W. BRADY, JR., Appellee/Cross-Appellant.
25 Fla. L. Weekly D1982c
765 So. 2d 870c Insurance — Homeowners — Settlement agreement — Where adjuster for insurer and adjuster for insured reached oral agreement regarding amount of loss to dwelling as result of lightning strike and fire, and behavior of parties indicated that insurer’s adjuster had settlement authority which he exercised before being taken off the case, there was a valid settlement agreement — Trial court properly entered summary judgment for insured in action against insurer for breach of settlement agreement — Insurer did not properly invoke appraisal provision of policy where parties, through their adjusters, had agreed to amount of loss — Attorney’s fees were properly awarded to insured who prevailed in action to enforce settlement agreement — Policy provision for insurer to pay 80% of additional living expenses did not constitute coinsurance, and statutory notice of coinsurance was not required — Portion of policy providing for payment of living expenses off premises was not an insurance policy or contract covering either real or personal property