40 Fla. L. Weekly D442a
157 So. 3d 507
Insurance — Automobile — Rescission — Material misrepresentations on application — Identity of owner of vehicle — Trial court properly found that claimant made material mispresentations in insurance application, warranting rescission of policy, by misrepresenting that she was registered owner of vehicle — Trial court erred in failing to consider claimant’s argument that insurer waived its misrepresentation or confessed judgment when it made PIP payments to claimant’s medical care providers after claimant filed suit — Statute does not provide that contract is void ab initio because of insured’s misrepresentation, but instead gives insurer the right to rescind insurance contract if statutory criteria are met; and case law establishes the principle that an insurer can forfeit its right of rescission — Trial court erred in finding that claimant lacked standing to assert her waiver and confession of judgment arguments because she assigned her rights to PIP benefits to her medical care providers — Remand for trial court to resolve waiver issue on the merits or, alternatively, submit matter to a jury — Confession of judgment — Whether insurer made payments to providers as result of claimant’s lawsuit and, thus, whether this constituted a confession of judgment is question for trial court to resolve — Evidence — PIP payout ledger — Statute providing that evidence of furnishing, or offering or promising to pay, medical or hospital expenses or other damages occasioned by an injury or accident is inadmissible to prove liablity for injury or accident does not make such evidence inadmissible to prove insurer’s obligation to make payments for or on behalf of its insured based on contract of insurance