Blog Articles

Featured Posts

PROGRESSIVE EXPRESS INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant-Defendant, v. MED-UNION MEDICAL CENTER, INC, a/a/o Maria V. DeSouza, Appellee-Plaintiff.

18 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 1113a

Online Reference: FLWSUPP 1811DESO

Insurance — Personal injury protection — Evidence — Expert witnesses — Abuse of discretion to strike insurer’s billing expert as witness without considering factors discussed in Pascual v. Dozier — Attorney’s fees — Appellate — Insurer failed to demonstrate substantive basis for appellate attorney’s fees where motion for fees does not include, cite, or reference any policy provision discussing attorney’s fees

Read More »

UNITED AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Petitioner, v. DAVID S. MAKLAN, D.C., P.A. d/b/a DEERFIELD CHIROPRACTIC CENTER (DARREN LEWIS), Respondent.

18 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 45a

Online Reference: FLWSUPP 1801LEWI

Insurance — Personal injury protection — Attorney’s fees — Trial court erred in entering final judgment entitling medical provider to appellate attorney’s fees for defense of certiorari challenge to discovery order prior to prevailing on merits of case

Read More »

HERNANDEZ, ANDRES, HERNANDEZ, FRANCISCO, Plaintiff, v. UNITED AUTOMOBILE INS. CO., Defendant.

18 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 1040a

Online Reference: FLWSUPP 1810AHER

Insurance — Personal injury protection — Attorney’s fees — Appellate — Amount — Hours requested by attorney are reduced where much of time charged was duplicative of time spent by lead appellate counsel, and case was county court case seeking less than $15,000 in damages — Expert witness fee and prejudgment interest are awarded

Read More »

GEORGE J. HAEDICKE, M.D. P.A., A Florida Corporation, Plaintiff, vs. JESSICA RENSMITH and SEMINOLE CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, A Florida Corporation, Defendants.

18 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 603a

Online Reference: FLWSUPP 1807HAED

Insurance — Personal injury protection — Attorney’s fees — Amount — Attorney travel time over and above what local attorney would charge is not warranted in absence of proof that competent local attorney could not be found — Costs and expert witness fees awarded

Read More »

PRIME CARE CHIROPRACTIC CENTERS, P.A., as assignee of Darlene Woodard, Plaintiff, vs. USAA CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant.

18 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 206b

Online Reference: FLWSUPP 1802DWOO

NOT FINAL VERSION OF OPINION
Subsequent Changes at 19 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 402a

Insurance — Personal injury protection — Attorney’s fees — Amount — Contingency risk multiplier — Establishing that a plaintiff would have difficulty finding competent counsel without possibility of multiplier does not require testimony from plaintiff demonstrating actual difficulties confronted in finding counsel — Where use of multiplier was necessary to obtain competent counsel in case, amount in controversy was small and results obtained were excellent, fee arrangement between medical provider and counsel was pure contingency fee agreement, provider’s chances of success at outset were 50%, and fact that insurer sought to set precedent on interpretation of disclosure and acknowledgment form provisions of PIP statute represented increased risk to counsel, multiplier of 2.0 is appropriate — Costs, expert witness fees, and prejudgment interest are awarded

Read More »