fbpx

Florida's Recent News

WIDE OPEN MRI, INC. a/a/o Charles Dor, Plaintiffs, vs. NATIONAL SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant.

18 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 682a

Online Reference: FLWSUPP 1808DOR

Insurance — Personal injury protection — Attorney’s fees — Proposal for settlement — Nominal $250 proposal for settlement was not made in good faith where at time offer was made, insurer did not have reasonable basis for concluding that its exposure was nominal in light of attorney’s fees and costs already incurred in years-long litigation, fact that medical provider had prevailed on all of insurer’s affirmative defenses, impossibility of predicting whether jury would believe insurer’s expert or treating physician regarding necessity of MRI, and insurer’s reliance on peer review which was unsupported by physical examination at a time when the law regarding whether insurer could rely on such reviews was in flux — Insurer’s motion for attorney’s fees and costs is denied

Read More »

UNITED AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, v. CHARLES MONTGOMERY, Appellee.

18 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 457a

Online Reference: FLWSUPP 1805MONT

Insurance — Attorney’s fees — Timeliness of motion — No merit to argument that, as prevailing party under section 627.428, insured was not required to serve motion for attorney’s fees within 30 days of judgment — Abuse of discretion to find that one-day delay in serving motion for fees resulted from excusable neglect where insured did not make motion alleging excusable neglect or give notice as required by rule 1.090(b)(2), and insured offered no explanation to justify extension of time except counsel’s inadvertence — Final judgment taxing attorney’s fees and costs is reversed

Read More »

SOUTH FLORIDA INSTITUTE OF MEDICINE and MICRO-DIAGNOSTIC (a/a/o JUAN TORRES), Plaintiff, v. UNITED AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant.

18 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 1054a

Online Reference: FLWSUPP 1810JTOR

Insurance — Attorney’s fees — Prejudgment interest is awarded to medical provider despite six-year delay between determination of entitlement to attorney’s fees and entry of final judgment on fee and cost award where there are no equitable circumstances supporting denial of prejudgment interest

Read More »

MEDICAL SPECIALISTS OF TAMPA BAY, LLC, DBA GULF COAST INJURY CENTER, a/a/o ARETHA REDDIN, Plaintiff, v. UNITED SERVICES AUTOMOBILE ASSOCIATION, Defendant.

18 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 693a

Online Reference: FLWSUPP 1808REDD

Insurance — Personal injury protection — Sanctions — Attorney’s fees — Where benefits were exhausted after medical provider filed suit but insurer failed to notify its own counsel or provider’s counsel of exhaustion of benefits for seven months, and provider’s counsel would not have continued to attempt to prosecute case if insurer had advised of exhaustion of benefits, provider’s motion for sanctions of attorney’s fees and costs is granted

Read More »

GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INS. CO., Appellant, vs. OPEN MRI OF MIAMI-DADE, LTD., Appellee.

18 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 337a

Online Reference: FLWSUPP 1804GOVE

Insurance — Personal injury protection — Demand letter — Error to strike insurer’s defense of insufficient demand letters where demand letters included bills for total amounts of MRIs that did not account for partial payments made by insurer — Attorney’s fees — Even if judgment below had been properly entered against insurer, medical provider should not have been awarded attorney’s fees where litigation was necessitated by insurer’s inability to comply with unclear demand letters

Read More »

BRISTOL WEST INSURANCE CO., Appellant, vs. CARE THERAPY & DIAGNOSTICS, INC. (a/a/o Emanuel Hernandez), Appellee.

18 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 35a

Online Reference: FLWSUPP 1801HERN

Insurance — Personal injury protection — Attorney’s fees — Proposal for settlement — Section 768.79 provides sufficient procedural guidance to make it an independent authority for award of attorney’s fees without invocation of rule 1.442 in small claims cases — Error to conclude that medical provider is prevailing party because it prevailed on significant issue where jury found that some of treatment was reasonable, related and necessary but returned zero-damages verdict — Remand for consideration of validity of insurer’s proposal for settlement

Read More »

UNITED AUTOMOBILE INS. CO., Appellant, vs. DAVID G. LEHRMAN a/a/o MARVIN LOGUE, Appellee.

18 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 30a

Online Reference: FLWSUPP 1801LEHR

Insurance — Personal injury protection — Attorney’s fees — Prevailing party — Fee agreement — No abuse of discretion in assessing attorney’s fees against insurer without requiring prevailing medical provider to produce retainer agreement to ensure that fee award does not exceed fee agreement between provider and his attorney where no written fee agreement existed, and provider’s attorney agreed orally to collect attorney’s fees based on court’s determination in accordance with PIP statute

Read More »

STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, v. BENJAMIN MARK MORROW, Appellee.

18 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 267a

Online Reference: FLWSUPP 1803MORR

Insurance — Personal injury protection — Attorney’s fees — Omnibus insured — Plaintiff who was additional driver covered under liability portion of fiancee’s insurance contract was not omnibus insured under policy when injured while driving his work vehicle and, therefore, cannot recover attorney’s fees under section 627.428 — Fee award under section 627.428 is also inappropriate because suit was over production of policy information, not wrongfully withheld benefits

Read More »

PEMBROKE PINES MRI, INC. (A/A/O COLEEN CARCELLI), Plaintiff, vs. UNITED SERVICES AUTOMOBILE ASSOCIATION, Defendant.

18 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 1189a

Online Reference: FLWSUPP 1811CARC

Insurance — Personal injury protection — Attorney’s fees — Offer of judgment — Good faith offer — Nominal offer of judgment was valid offer made in good faith where insurer had reasonable basis to conclude that its exposure was nominal and its liability was nonexistent since benefits had been exhausted — Justiciable issues — Award of fees under section 57.105 is denied

Read More »

Monthly Archive

2023

2024

2025

Need an attorney?

Latest News

Skip to content